Cited by 53Nursing education and managementHealthcare Quality and ManagementNursing Roles and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hospital Use of Agency‐Employed Supplemental Nurses and Patient Mortality and Failure to Rescue

Open access
Aiken, Linda H., Shang, Jingjing, Xue, Ying, Sloane, Douglas M.·2013·Health Services Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between the use of agency-employed supplemental registered nurses (SRNs) to staff hospitals and patient mortality and failure to rescue (FTR). DATA SOURCES: Primary survey data from 40,356 registered nurses in 665 hospitals in four states in 2006 were linked with American Hospital Association and inpatient mortality data from state agencies for approximately 1.3 million patients. STUDY DESIGN: Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between SRN use and 30-day in-hospital mortality and FTR, controlling for patient and hospital characteristics, nurse staffing, the proportion of nurses with bachelor's degrees, and quality of the work environment. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Before controlling for multiple nurse characteristics of hospitals, higher proportions of agency-employed SRNs in hospitals appeared to be associated with higher mortality (OR = 1.06) and FTR (OR = 1.05). Hospitals with higher proportions of SRNs have poorer work environments, however, and the significant relationships between SRNs and mortality outcomes were rendered insignificant when work environments were taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: Higher use of SRNs does not appear to have deleterious consequences for patient mortality and may alleviate nurse staffing problems that could produce higher mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-6773.12018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.2105/AJPH.87.1.103 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1001/jama.290.12.1617 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/01.NNA.0000285119.53066.ae · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01114.x · DOI
  6. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182330b6e · DOI
  7. 10.1136/bmj.e1717 · DOI
  8. 10.1086/502160 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/milmed/161.1.48 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1527154407312737 · DOI
  11. 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w657 · DOI
  12. Gregoire T., 2011, Staffing Industry Forecast: September Update Healthcare Staffing Summit
  13. Hughes K. K., 1991, Recruitment, Retention, and Compensation of Agency and Hospital Nurses, Journal of Nursing Administration, 21, 46
  14. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181468ca3 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01391.x · DOI
  16. 10.1002/nur.10032 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1097/00006199-200601000-00001 · DOI
  18. 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w316 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00658.x · DOI
  20. 10.1056/NEJMsa1001025 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1097/00006199-199507000-00007 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.mnl.2006.04.009 · DOI
  23. 10.2307/2291124 · DOI
  24. Silber J. H., 1995, Evaluation of the Complication Rate as a Measure of Quality of Care in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 317, 10.1001/jama.1995.03530040045039 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00026 · DOI
  26. 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000313758.33654.49 · DOI
  27. 10.1097/00001786-199607000-00009 · DOI
  28. 10.1097/00005110-199506000-00011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aiken, L. H., Shang, J., Xue, Y., & Sloane, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Aiken, Linda H.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-06
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
931-948
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2035914323
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR004513, T32–NR0714, T32NR007104, R01-NR04513)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
Keywords
agency nurses, patient mortality, failure to rescue, nurse staffing, work environment, 30-day in-hospital mortality, hospital nursing workforce
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Environment, Female, Hospital Administration, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Quality of Health Care, United States, Nursing Administration Research, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review