Cited by 1,769Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesHealthcare Quality and Management

Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index†‡

Lake, Eileen T.·2002·Research in Nursing & Health

Abstract

Five subscales were derived from the Nursing Work Index (NWI) to measure the hospital nursing practice environment, using 1985–1986 nurse data from 16 magnet hospitals. The NWI comprises organizational characteristics of the original magnet hospitals. The psychometric properties of the subscales and a composite measure were established. All measures were highly reliable at the nurse and hospital levels. Construct validity was supported by higher scores of nurses in magnet versus nonmagnet hospitals. Confirmatory analyses of contemporary data from 11,636 Pennsylvania nurses supported the subscales. The soundness of the new measures is supported by their theoretical and empirical foundations, conceptual integrity, psychometric strength, and generalizability. The measures could be used to study how the practice environment influences nurse and patient outcomes. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 25:176–188, 2002

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nur.10032

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The nurses' professional practice environment was measured using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, endorsed by the National Quality Forum.

    “The nurses’ professional practice environment was measured using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, endorsed by the National Quality Forum.26,27”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lake, E. T.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Lake, Eileen T.
Venue
Research in Nursing & Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-05-03
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
176-188
ISSN
  • 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-240X
OpenAlex
W1977592497
Cited by
1,769
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 112 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 168 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 79
FWCI
25.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Nursing & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k01nr000166-03)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR004513, K01-NR00166, R01-NR04513)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
Nursing Work Index, nursing work environment, Magnet hospitals, scale development, psychometric properties, construct validity, reliability statistics, nursing outcomes, patient outcomes, organizational characteristics
MeSH terms
Accreditation, Attitude of Health Personnel, Awards and Prizes, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Health Facility Environment, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Job Satisfaction, Nurse Administrators, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Nursing, Supervisory, Pennsylvania, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Organizational Culture, Nursing Administration Research, Workload, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review