Assessing the Impact of Financial Incentives in Extension Programmes: Evidence From Ireland
Open accessAbstract
We evaluate whether the effectiveness of a participatory extension programme changes when an incentive is introduced that financially rewards farmers for participation. Using data from a dairy farm extension programme operated in I reland, the evaluation assesses whether farmers who joined before the financial incentive was introduced receive larger benefits from the extension programme than farmers who joined after the financial incentive. The results from a propensity score matching analysis reveal that farmers who joined before the incentive significantly improved their farm performance, as measured in gross margins and yields, while farmers who joined after the incentive did not significantly benefit from the extension programme. This implies that the incentive to participate is a windfall gain to these later participants.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural productivity and poverty in East Africa
Davis, K., Nkonya, E., Kato, E., Mekonnen, D. A., Odendo, M., Miiro, R., & Nkuba, J. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.019 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Läpple, D., Hennessy, T., & Newman, C. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12000 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extension and management pathways for enhanced farm sustainability: evidence from Irish dairy farms
Balaine, L., Läpple, D., Dillon, E. J., & Buckley, C. (2023) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbac033 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationAdenuga, A. H., & Jack, C. (2025) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113714 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Läpple, D., & Hennessy, T.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Hennessy, Thia
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03-02
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 781-795
- ISSN
- 0021-857X (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9552
- OpenAlex
- W2027258040
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
- Keywords
- financial incentives, participatory extension, farmer participation, farm performance, gross margin, crop yield, windfall gains, Ireland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review