The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a sociocognitive approach to second Llanguage acquisition
Abstract
This article develops the notion of a sociocognitive perspective on second language acquisition (SLA), proposed as an alternative to the cognitivism pervading the field. By sociocognitive, I mean a view of language and language acquisition as simultaneously occurring and interactively constructed both “in the head” and “in the world.” First, I develop a view of language and its acquisition as social phenomena—as existing and taking place for the performance of action in the (socially‐mediated) world. Second, I describe the cognitive nature of language and its acquisition, focusing especially on recent developments in connectionism. Third, I introduce sociocognitive views of language and posit a social interpretation of connectionism as bridging the gap between cognition and social action. Fourth, I discuss sociocognitive perspectives on first language acquisition. Fifth, I describe the cognitivist biases of much SLA research, then suggest how sociocognitive approaches can help overcome them. I end by considering implications of the perspective I develop in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science
Hacking, I. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814563 · Cited by 4,814
Action and embodiment within situated human interaction
Goodwin, C. (2000) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x · Cited by 3,073
Referring as a collaborative process
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7 · Cited by 2,401
Language Acquisition and Use: Learning and Applying Probabilistic Constraints
Seidenberg, M. S. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1599 · Cited by 338
Cited by
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/aml029 · Cited by 805
Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective
FREEMAN, D. L., & CAMERON, L. (2008) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00714.x · Cited by 363
Peterson, M. (2012) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344012000195 · Cited by 172
Yuan, Y. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2282112 · Cited by 148
Ikumi Hitosugi, C., Schmidt, M., & Hayashi, K. (2014) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.31.1.19-39 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, D.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525-545
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2094046912
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 58.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.