The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems
Abstract
In this introduction to the special issue, a response‐to‐instruction approach to learning disabilities (LD) identification is discussed. Then, an overview of the promise and the potential pitfalls of such an approach is provided. The potential benefits include identification of students based on risk rather than deficit, early identification and instruction, reduction of identification bias, and linkage of identification assessment with instructional planning. Questions concern the integrity of the LD concept, the need for validated interventions and assessment methods, the adequacy of response to instruction as the endpoint in identification, the appropriate instruction intensity, the need for adequately trained personnel, and due process. Finally, an overview of the articles constituting the special issue is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions
Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2007.12087917 · Cited by 424
Self-citationWhat We Need to Know About Responsiveness To Intervention (and Shouldn't Be Afraid to Ask)
Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. D. (2007) · Learning Disabilities Research & Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x · Cited by 316
GERSTEN, R., & DIMINO, J. A. (2006) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.41.1.5 · Cited by 226
Klingner, J. K., & Harry, B. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00781.x · Cited by 183
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Bryant, J. D., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2007) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290707300303 · Cited by 163
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S.
- Venue
- Learning Disabilities Research & Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-06-13
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 137-146
- ISSN
- 0938-8982 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5826
- OpenAlex
- W2058104674
- Cited by
- 780
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-5826.00070
- The paper
- Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.