The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User toolkits for innovation
Open accessAbstract
Manufacturers must accurately understand user needs in order to develop successful products‐but the task is becoming steadily more difficult as user needs change more rapidly, and as firms increasingly seek to serve “markets of one.” User toolkits for innovation allow manufacturers to actually abandon their attempts to understand user needs in detail in favor of transferring need‐related aspects of product and service development to users along with an appropriate toolkit. User toolkits for innovation are specific to given product or service type and to a specified production system. Within those general constraints, they give users real freedom to innovate, allowing them to develop their custom product via iterative trial‐and‐error. That is, users can create a preliminary design, simulate or prototype it, evaluate its functioning in their own use environment, and then iteratively improve it until satisfied. As the concept is evolving, toolkits guide the user to insure that the completed design can be produced on the intended production system without change. Pioneering applications in areas ranging from the development of custom integrated circuits to the development of custom foods show that user toolkits for innovation can be much more effective than traditional, manufacturer‐based development methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery
Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152082 · Cited by 2,058
Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits
von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.7.821.2817
Cited by
The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach
Osterwalder, A. (2004) · Unknown · doi:10.22005/bcu.15985 · Cited by 1,932
Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20046 · Cited by 1,406
Customer participation and value creation: a systematic review and research implications
Mustak, M., Jaakkola, E., & Halinen, A. (2013) · Managing Service Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/msq-03-2013-0046 · Cited by 302
The Value of Codesign: The Effect of Customer Involvement in Service Design Teams
Trischler, J., Pervan, S. J., Kelly, S. J., & Scott, D. R. (2018) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670517714060 · Cited by 292
The creator economy: An introduction and a call for scholarly research
Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D. A., & Sorescu, A. (2024) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.07.005 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- von Hippel, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 247-257
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W2000718498
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: User toolkits for innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-5885.1840247
- The paper
- von Hippel, E. (2001). User toolkits for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1840247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.