Voting May Be Habit‐Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment
Abstract
Habit is a frequently mentioned but understudied cause of political action. This article provides the first direct test of the hypothesis that casting a ballot in one election increases one's propensity to go to the polls in the future. A field experiment involving 25,200 registered voters was conducted prior to the November general election of 1998. Subjects were randomly assigned to treatment conditions in which they were urged to vote through direct mail or face‐to‐face canvassing. Compared to a control group that received no contact, the treatment groups were significantly more likely to vote in 1998. The treatment groups were also significantly more likely to vote in local elections held in November of 1999. After deriving a statistical estimator to isolate the effect of habit, we find that, ceteris paribus, voting in one election substantially increases the likelihood of voting in the future. Indeed, the influence of past voting exceeds the effects of age and education reported in previous studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All else being equal, young people who turned out to vote in their first-ever election are more likely to vote in future elections.
“All else being equal, young people who turned out to vote in their first-ever election are more likely to vote in future elections.”
From Longer-Term Effects of Voting at Age 16: Higher Turnout Among Young People in Scotland (2025) · cites this paper as Gerber et al., 2003
Cites
Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique.
Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0023552 · Cited by 1,637 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Allcott, H., & Rogers, T. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.10.3003 · Cited by 1,340 · see citing works
Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research
Geys, B. (2006) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.09.002 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout
Smets, K., & van Ham, C. (2013) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections
Cancela, J., & Geys, B. (2016) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
The Formation of Voting Habits
Dinas, E. (2012) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2012.718280 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
First-Time Boost Beats Experience: The Effect of past Eligibility on Turnout
Bhatti, Y., Hansen, K. M., & Wass, H. (2016) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.12.005 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Longer-Term Effects of Voting at Age 16: Higher Turnout Among Young People in Scotland
Eichhorn, J., & Huebner, C. (2025) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.9283 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Voting in elections is theorised to be habit‐forming (Denny & Doyle, 2009; Dinas, 2012; Gerber et al., 2003; Meredith, 2009; Plutzer, 2002).”
- Authors
- Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gerber, Alan S.
- Green, Donald P.
- Shachar, Ron
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 540-550
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5907
- OpenAlex
- W2101029005
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 58.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Keywords
- voting behavior, voter turnout, political participation, voter mobilization, local elections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review