The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Organizations in the Public Sector? A Study of Police Agencies Employing Information and Technology to Advance Knowledge
Abstract
In an attempt to reap the purported benefits that “knowledge workers” bring to organizations, many police departments have shifted to a community problem–oriented policing philosophy. Rather than focusing on enforcement and incarceration, this philosophy is based on the dissemination of information to promote a proactive, preventative approach to reduce crime and disorder. In keeping with much of the contemporary literature on the “learning organization” (sometimes called the “knowledge organization”), police departments hope to deter crime through the knowledge benefits that derive from information and its associated technologies. With goals to stimulate productivity, performance, and effectiveness, police departments across the country are employing information technology to turn police officers into problem solvers and to leverage their intellectual capital to preempt crime and neighborhood deterioration. Many public and private organizations are striving to change their operations toward this same concept of the knowledge worker. Information technology is often touted as a vehicle for capturing, tracking, sorting, and providing information to advance knowledge, thus leading to improvements in service–delivery efforts. Based on an extensive study of police departments that have attempted to implement a knowledge–worker paradigm (supported by information technology initiatives), this research explores the feasibility, effectiveness, and limitations of information and technology in promoting the learning organization in the public sector.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Bounded rationality and organizational learning
Simon, H. A. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.125 · Cited by 3,028
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401
Cited by
Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012) · 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2012.615 · Cited by 2,599
Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities
Fullwood, R., Rowley, J., & Delbridge, R. (2013) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673271311300831 · Cited by 406
Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector
Goldfinch, S. (2007) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00778.x · Cited by 283
Implementing e-government in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK
Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Kurunananda, A. (2009) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1002/itdj.20122 · Cited by 68
Objectivity and accountability in migration control using risk assessment tools
Dekkers, T., van der Woude, M., & Koulish, R. (2019) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370818771831 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-43
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2060902547
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Organizations in the Public Sector? A Study of Police Agencies Employing Information and Technology to Advance Knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-6210.00262
- The paper
- Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L. (2003). Learning Organizations in the Public Sector? A Study of Police Agencies Employing Information and Technology to Advance Knowledge. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00262
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.