The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Edible Insects Processing: Traditional and Innovative Technologies
Abstract
Insects are part of the human diet in many parts of the world. Their nutritional value is widely recognized. Currently, most edible insects are harvested from the wild, although semi‐domestication and indoor farming have increased insect availability and the sustainability of production. In traditional cultures, insects are processed in a number of ways (steaming, roasting, smoking, frying, stewing, and curing, among others) to improve their sensory and nutritional qualities as well as their shelf‐life. In order to increase consumer interest in the West, various technologies have been developed that are aimed primarily at using insects as ingredients in a non‐recognizable form, such as powders or flour. These technologies include drying (sun‐drying, freeze‐drying, oven‐drying, fluidized bed drying, and microwave‐drying) and new processing methods (ultrasound‐assisted extraction, cold atmospheric pressure plasma, and dry fractionation) designed mainly for protein, fat, and/or chitin extraction. Insect‐based ingredients are sold for the production of cookies, chocolates, tortilla‐style chips, and other snacks. This review focuses on edible insect production, processing technologies, and commercialization using strategies ranging from traditional to novel as a sustainable approach for improving food security worldwide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
(2018) · A New Era in Global Health · doi:10.1891/9780826190123.ap02 · Cited by 19,351
Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects
Rumpold, B. A., & Schlüter, O. K. (2013) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.201200735 · Cited by 1,796
Factors Influencing Children’s Eating Behaviours
Scaglioni, S., De Cosmi, V., Ciappolino, V., Parazzini, F., Brambilla, P., & Agostoni, C. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10060706 · Cited by 1,238
The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review
van Huis, A., & Oonincx, D. G. A. B. (2017) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8 · Cited by 1,034
Oonincx, D. G. A. B., van Broekhoven, S., van Huis, A., & van Loon, J. J. A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144601 · Cited by 945
Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society
Verbeke, W. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008 · Cited by 849
Edible Insects in a Food Safety and Nutritional Perspective: A Critical Review
Belluco, S., Losasso, C., Maggioletti, M., Alonzi, C. C., Paoletti, M. G., & Ricci, A. (2013) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12014 · Cited by 708
Nutritional and sensory quality of edible insects
Kouřimská, L., & Adámková, A. (2016) · NFS Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nfs.2016.07.001 · Cited by 629
Early Influences on the Development of Food Preferences
Ventura, A. K., & Worobey, J. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.037 · Cited by 626
The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China
Hartmann, C., Shi, J., Giusto, A., & Siegrist, M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.013 · Cited by 596
Cited by
Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market - a review
Lee, H. J., Yong, H. I., Kim, M., Choi, Y.-S., & Jo, C. (2020) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.20.0419 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Melgar‐Lalanne, G., Hernández‐Álvarez, A., & Salinas‐Castro, A.
- Venue
- Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-06-30
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1166-1191
- ISSN
- 1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2955932277
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 29.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Edible Insects Processing: Traditional and Innovative Technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1541-4337.12463
- The paper
- Melgar‐Lalanne, G., Hernández‐Álvarez, A., & Salinas‐Castro, A. (2019). Edible Insects Processing: Traditional and Innovative Technologies. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.