Cited by 280Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactMeat and Animal Product QualityInsect Utilization and Effects

Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market - a review

Open access
Lee, Hyun Jung, Yong, Hae In, Kim, Minsu, Choi, Yun-Sang, Jo, Cheorun·2020·Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Abstract

Plant-based meat analogues, edible insects, and cultured meat are promising major meat alternatives that can be used as protein sources in the future. It is also believed that the importance of meat alternatives will continue to increase because of concerns on limited sustainability of the traditional meat production system. The meat alternatives are expected to have different roles based on their different benefits and limitations. Plant-based meat analogues and edible insects can replace traditional meat as a good protein source from the perspective of nutritional value. Furthermore, plant-based meat can be made available to a wide range of consumers (e.g., as vegetarian or halal food products). However, despite ongoing technical developments, their palatability, including appearance, flavor, and texture, is still different from the consumers' standard established from livestock-based traditional meat. Meanwhile, cultured meat is the only method to produce actual animal muscle-based meat; therefore, the final product is more meat-like compared to other meat analogues. However, technical difficulties, especially in mass production and cost, remain before it can be commercialized. Nevertheless, these meat alternatives can be a part of our future protein sources while maintaining a complementary relationship with traditional meat.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5713/ajas.20.0419

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cell-based meat is produced through stem cell and large-scale cell culture technologies and has taste and texture similar to real meat.

    “Cell-based meat is produced through the development of stem cell and large-scale cell culture technologies and thus has a taste and texture similar to real meat.138”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [138]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fiddes, N. Meat: A natural symbol. 1st ed. New York, USA: Routledge; 2004.
  2. Kim CJ. Development of meat substitutes using vegetable protein. In: Proceedings of the EASDL Conference 2005; 2005 Apr 30; Chonan, Korea: The East Asian Society of Dietary Life; 2005. pp. 75.
  3. Jeong JY, Jo C. Utilization of meat substitutes and materials in the meat and meat processing industry. Food Sci Anim Resour Ind 2018;7:2-11.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, H. J., Yong, H. I., Kim, M., Choi, Y.-S., & Jo, C.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Korea Food Research Institute (KR)
Corresponding author
Jo, Cheorun
Venue
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Published
2020-10-01
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
1533-1543
ISSN
  • 1011-2367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1976-5517
OpenAlex
W3045613394
Cited by
280
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4
FWCI
16.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (118042-03)
  • Seoul National University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
Keywords
meat substitutes, plant-based meat, edible insects, cultured meat, alternative protein sources, meat market, palatability, mass production, commercialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review