The Evolution and Cultural Framing of Food Safety Management Systems—Where From and Where Next?
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this paper is to review the development of food safety management systems (FSMS) from their origins in the 1950s to the present. The food safety challenges in modern food supply systems are explored and it is argued that there is a need for a more holistic thinking approach to food safety management. The narrative review highlights that while the transactional elements of how FSMS are developed, validated, implemented, monitored, and verified remains largely unchanged, how organizational culture frames the operation and efficacy of FSMS is becoming more important. The evolution of a wider academic and industry understanding of both the influence of food safety culture (FS‐culture) and also how such culture frames and enables, or conversely restricts the efficacy of the FSMS is crucial for consumer well‐being. Potential research gaps worthy of further study are identified as well as recommendations given for the application of the research findings within the food industry.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Food Safety, Food Fraud, and Food Defense: A Fast Evolving Literature
Manning, L., & Soon, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/1750-3841.13256 · Cited by 268 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…by stakeholders and actors in the food supply chain, 629 including consumers, influence how FSMS are developed and implemented, as well as the degree of actor 630 engagement with the processes that are required to ensure food is consistently safe and wholesome 631 (Manning & Soon, 2016b).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAlbersmeier, F., Schulze, H., Jahn, G., & Spiller, A. (2009) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.01.010 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Food safety culture: the evolution of an emerging risk factor?
Griffith, C. J., Livesey, K. M., & Clayton, D. A. (2010) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070701011034439 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Manning, L., Luning, P. A., & Wallace, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Royal Agricultural University (GB)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- University of Lancashire (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Manning, Louise
- Venue
- Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-09-19
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1770-1792
- ISSN
- 1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2961164615
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Royal Agricultural University Repository (Royal Agricultural University) (acceptedVersion)
- CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Quality and Management Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Keywords
- food safety management systems, food safety culture, organizational culture, history of food safety, food supply system, food industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
