Cited by 268Food Safety and HygieneIdentification and Quantification in FoodPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Food Safety, Food Fraud, and Food Defense: A Fast Evolving Literature

Open access
Manning, Louise, Soon, Jan Mei·2016·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

Intentional food crime is plural in nature in terms of the types of crime and the differing levels of financial gain. Successful models of food crime are dependent on how well the crime has been executed and at what point, or even if, detection actually occurs. The aim of this paper is to undertake a literature review and critique the often contradictory definitions that can be found in the literature in order to compare and contrast existing food crime risk assessment tools and their application. Food safety, food defense, and food fraud risk assessments consider different criteria in order to determine the degree of situational risk for each criteria and the measures that need to be implemented to mitigate that risk. Further research is required to support the development of global countermeasures, that are of value in reducing overall risk even when the potential hazards may be largely unknown, and specific countermeasures that can act against unique risks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1750-3841.13256

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manning, L., & Soon, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Agricultural University (GB)
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Manning, Louise
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-02
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
R823-34
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W2341811507
Cited by
268
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Harper Adams University Repository (GuildHE Research) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
food safety, food fraud, food defense, risk assessment tools, risk mitigation, countermeasures
MeSH terms
Crime, Food, Fraud, Humans, Risk Assessment, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review