The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE COMPANY YOU KEEP? THE SPILLOVER EFFECTS OF GANG MEMBERSHIP ON INDIVIDUAL GUNSHOT VICTIMIZATION IN A CO‐OFFENDING NETWORK
Open accessAbstract
The effects of gang membership on individual social, behavior, cognitive, and health outcomes are well documented. Yet, research consistently has shown that gang membership and the boundaries of gangs are often fluid and amorphous. The current study examines how social proximity to a gang member in one's co‐offending network influences the probability of being a gunshot victim. We re‐create and analyze the social network of all individuals who were arrested, summonsed for a quality‐of‐life violation, and subjected to noncustodial police contacts in Newark, New Jersey, during a 1‐year time period (N = 10,531). A descriptive network analysis finds an extreme concentration of fatal and nonfatal gunshot injuries within a small social network: Nearly one third of all shootings in Newark occur in a network that contains less than 4 percent of the city's total population. Furthermore, a series of logistic regression models finds that being directly or indirectly linked to a gang member in one's co‐offending network has a significant effect on one's probability of being a gunshot victim. Implications of these findings for the study of gangs, gun violence, and a public health approach to violence are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exposure to violence through co-offending or network relationships may increase the risk of violent behaviour.
“The literature further demonstrates that exposure to violence through co-offending or network relationships may increase the risk of violent behaviour (Tracy et al., 2016; Papachristos et al., 2015a; Fox et al., 2021; Bailey et al., 2020; Conway and McCord 2020; McGloin & Piquero, 2009; Bond & Bushman, 2017).”
From The Compounding Effect: How Co-Offending Exacerbates the Harm Caused by Violent Offenders (2024) · cites this paper as Papachristos et al., 2015a
Citations
Cites
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127
The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa066082 · Cited by 5,007
The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0706154 · Cited by 2,390
Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a2338 · Cited by 1,990
Network Exposure and Homicide Victimization in an African American Community
Papachristos, A. V., & Wildeman, C. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301441 · Cited by 123
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300908 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01241.x · DOI
- 10.1086/386272 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2093948 · DOI · Paper page
- Bouchard Martin, 2014, Crime and Networks
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00281.x · DOI
- 10.1080/00380237.1999.10571125 · DOI
- 10.1086/228667 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088767998002003007 · DOI
- Csardi Gabor, 2006, The igraph software package for complex network research, InterJournal, 1695
- 10.1080/07418829600092931 · DOI
- 10.1177/0011128706296664 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088767910385400 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01142.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01049.x · DOI
- Fleisher Mark S., 1998, Dead End Kids: Gang Girls and the Boys They Know
- Fleisher Mark S., 2006, Studying Youth Gangs
- Garot Robert, 2010, Who You Claim? Performing Gang Identity in School and on the Streets
- 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301821 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00513.x · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226316666.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022234027028 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.297.11.1224 · DOI
- 10.1086/320298 · DOI
- 10.1111/1745-9125.12020 · DOI
- Kadushin Charles, 2012, Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings
- Kennedy David M., 1997, Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention
- Klofas John, 2006, Crime Incident Reviews: Case Study 3
- 10.1007/s10461-005-1679-y · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00219.x · DOI
- 10.1057/sj.2009.18 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00016-3 · DOI
- 10.1177/0049124193022001006 · DOI
- 10.2307/2095194 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00306.x · DOI
- McGloin Jean M., 2014, Crime and Networks
- 10.1177/0022427809348905 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-0-387-09526-4 · DOI
- Papachristos Andrew V., 2006, Studying Youth Gangs
- Papachristos Andrew V., 2011, Measuring Crime & Criminality: Advances in Criminological Theory
- 10.1007/s11524-012-9703-9 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003122413486800 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10940-006-9022-y · DOI
- 10.1080/07418820400095991 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022427813484316 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022427813516128 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022427811434830 · DOI
- R Core Team, 2014, R: A Language and Environment for Statsitical Computing
- 10.1038/mp.2010.13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226733883.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Sierra‐Arevalo Michael, 2015, Handbook of Gangs and Gang Responses
- 10.1080/07418820802024911 · DOI
- StataCorp, 2011, Stata Statistical Software: Release 12
- Sutherland Edwin H., 1947, Principles of Criminology
- Thornberry Terence P., 1998, Serious and Violent Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions
- Thornberry Terence P., 2003, Gangs and Delinquency in Development Perspective
- U.S. Department of Justice, 2012, Crime in the United States
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301014.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511803956 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511815478 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10940-010-9105-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/07418825.2012.732100 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing
Brayne, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190684099.001.0001 · Cited by 334
Green, B., Horel, T., & Papachristos, A. V. (2017) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8245 · Cited by 228
Self-citationThe Contagious Spread of Violence Among US Adolescents Through Social Networks
Bond, R. M., & Bushman, B. J. (2017) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2016.303550 · Cited by 60
The Compounding Effect: How Co-Offending Exacerbates the Harm Caused by Violent Offenders
Piper, E., Ariel, B., Harinam, V., & Bland, M. (2024) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-024-09765-9 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- PAPACHRISTOS, A. V., BRAGA, A. A., PIZA, E., & GROSSMAN, L. S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-20
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 624-649
- ISSN
- 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9125
- OpenAlex
- W2172018899
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 30.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (CAREER)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Keywords
- gang membership, social networks, gun violence, spillover effects, social proximity, Newark, New Jersey, public health approach to violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review