CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,214

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect

Sampson, Robert J., Wilson, William Julius·2012
DOI 10.7208/chicago/9780226733883.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226733883.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Residents who refuse to seek help from the police are thought to rely on the code of the street to dole out sanctions through violence or other informal means.

    “Residents who refuse to seek help from the police are thought to rely on the code to dole out sanctions through violence or other informal means (Kirk and Papachristos 2011; Sampson 2012).”

    From Police Violence and Citizen Crime Reporting in the Black Community (2016) · cites this paper as Sampson 2012

  • Negative encounters with law enforcement, as well as high-profile cases of police misconduct, contribute to the spread of legal cynicism within black communities.

    “Previous research shows that negative encounters with law enforcement, as well as high-profile cases of police misconduct, contribute to the spread of legal cynicism within black communities (Kirk and Papachristos 2011; Sampson 2012; Weitzer 2002).”

    From Police Violence and Citizen Crime Reporting in the Black Community (2016) · cites this paper as Sampson 2012

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J.
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2012
DOI
10.7208/chicago/9780226733883.001.0001
Cited by
2,214
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review