The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Threat assessment as a school violence prevention strategy
Abstract
Research Summary: This paper describes the immense difficulty of predicting that someone is going to carry out a school shooting and then turns to threat assessment as a more promising violence prevention strategy. In schools, a multidisciplinary threat assessment team investigates reported threats and develops responses that are calibrated to the seriousness of the threat and the student's educational needs. Researchers have found that school teams have been able to resolve thousands of student threats with no serious acts of violence, yet permitting the majority of students to return to school. Controlled studies have found that schools using this approach can have reductions in the use of school suspension and improvements in student and teacher perceptions of school climate. Policy Implications: Threat assessment represents a fundamental shift in the risk assessment field away from the pursuit of predictive accuracy toward a broader approach to the prevention of violence by helping troubled individuals. Threat assessment offers schools a proactive alternative to reactive practices such as zero tolerance discipline and costly investment in building security measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Hawkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., Ramey, S. L., Shure, M. B., & Long, B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.10.1013 · Cited by 1,253
Cornell, D. G., Allen, K., & Fan, X. (2012) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2012.12087378 · Cited by 106
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.1080/09243450802332184 · DOI
- American Psychological Association, 1999, Warning signs
- Borum R., 2003, Structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY)
- 10.3102/0013189X09357620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/tam0000092 · DOI
- Canady M., 2012, To protect & educate: The school resource officer and the prevention of violence in schools
- 10.1007/BF01044882 · DOI
- Cornell D., 2018, Comprehensive School Threat Assessment Guidelines
- 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03547.x · DOI
- Cornell D., 2011, Reductions in long‐term suspensions following adoption of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines, Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 95, 175
- 10.1007/s40688-017-0146-x · DOI
- 10.1037/spq0000220 · DOI
- 10.17105/SPR-2017-0030.V47-2 · DOI
- Cornell D., 2006, Guidelines for responding to student threats of violence
- 10.1037/a0016182 · DOI
- 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086266 · DOI
- Daniels J. A., 2019, A preliminary report on the Police Foundation's Averted School Violence Database
- 10.1300/J202v06n01_06 · DOI
- Dwyer K., 1998, Early warning, timely response: A guide to safe schools
- 10.1136/bmj.e4692 · DOI
- 10.1080/10474412.2014.929950 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoffman J., 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment, 160
- 10.15585/mmwr.mm6803a1 · DOI
- Jamieson C., 2013, Psychological Science Agenda
- JustChildren, 2013, Prevention v. punishment: Threat assessment, school suspensions, and racial disparities
- Kann L., 2018, Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2017, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67, 1
- 10.1056/NEJM199310073291506 · DOI
- King S., 2019, School security in the post‐Columbine era: Trends, consequences, and future directions, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 1
- Kropp P. R., 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment, 178
- 10.1111/1745-9133.12468 · DOI
- Langman P., 2019, A comparison of averted and completed school attacks from the Police Foundation Averted School Violence Database
- 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.006 · DOI
- McGee J. P., 1999, The classroom avenger, The Forensic Examiner, 8, 1
- 10.1111/1556-4029.12196 · DOI
- 10.1377/hlthaff.12.4.7 · DOI
- 10.1080/1045988X.2011.654366 · DOI
- Morgan E., 2014, The School Discipline Consensus Report: Strategies from the field to keep students engaged in school and out of the juvenile justice system
- 10.1001/jama.2013.38 · DOI
- National School Safety Center, 1998, Checklist of characteristics of youth who have caused school‐associated violent deaths
- 10.1080/15388220.2012.706764 · DOI
- 10.1037/tam0000038 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0038967 · DOI
- O'Toole M. E., 2000, The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective
- Otto R., 2010, Handbook of violence risk assessment
- Pollack W. S., 2008, Prior knowledge of potential school‐based violence: Information students learn may prevent a targeted attack
- Riedman D., 2018, K‐12 school shooting database: Research methodology
- 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2565 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15326918CS0303_2 · DOI
- Straub F., 2018, How students can help SROs and others avert school violence, The Journal of School Safety, 32
- 10.1177/019874290803400104 · DOI
- Toupin J., 1993, Homicide: The victim/offender connection, 135
- Vossekuil B., 2002, The final report and findings of the Safe School Initiative
- Whitaker A., 2019, Cops and no counselors how the lack of school mental health staff is harming students
- 10.1037/a0020473 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Public Support for Policies to Reduce School Shootings: A Moral-Altruistic Model
Burton, A. L., Pickett, J. T., Jonson, C. L., Cullen, F. T., & Burton, V. S. (2021) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427820953202 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornell, D. G.
- Venue
- Criminology & Public Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 235-252
- ISSN
- 1538-6473
- 1745-9133
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Threat assessment as a school violence prevention strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1745-9133.12471
- The paper
- Cornell, D. G. (2020). Threat assessment as a school violence prevention strategy. Criminology & Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.