Cited by 34Policing Practices and PerceptionsDeception detection and forensic psychologyCriminal Law and Evidence

Effects of police body‐worn cameras on citizen compliance and cooperation: Findings from a quasi‐randomized controlled trial

Open access
Demir, Mustafa, Braga, Anthony A., Apel, Robert·2020·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary This study tests the effect of body‐worn cameras (BWCs) on stopped drivers’ perceptions of complying with police directives, obeying traffic laws, and cooperating with the police. A quasi‐randomized controlled trial was conducted with drivers stopped at routine traffic checkpoints. Drivers in the treatment group encountered police officers wearing BWCs, and drivers in the control group encountered police officers without BWCs. Surveys were administered after the stop. Findings suggest motorists exposed to BWC officers reported significantly stronger agreement with compliance with police directives, obedience toward traffic laws, and assistance with police duties. Further analysis indicates BWCs generate indirect impacts on specific citizen compliance mediated through improvements in procedural justice, as well as indirect impacts on general compliance and cooperation mediated through improvements in both police legitimacy and procedural justice. Policy Implications The results suggest that BWCs may be an effective means of improving drivers’ willingness to comply with directives, follow traffic laws, and assist police. Consistent with a process‐based explanation, their effectiveness stems almost entirely from drivers’ experience of procedurally just and legitimacy‐enhancing treatment by police officers. The findings indicate BWCs provide a form of officer accountability that mere training in procedural justice might be insufficient to achieve.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9133.12505

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demir, M., Braga, A. A., & Apel, R.
Affiliations
  • SUNY Plattsburgh (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Demir, Mustafa
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2020-06-15
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
855-882
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W3035974831
Cited by
34
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
Keywords
police body cameras, citizen compliance, police legitimacy, procedural justice, traffic stops, traffic checkpoints, police accountability, police-citizen cooperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review