Cited by 9Policing Practices and PerceptionsEducation Discipline and InequalityCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Do body‐worn cameras reduce disparities in police behavior in minority communities? Evidence of nuanced influences across Black and Hispanic neighborhoods

Open access
Huff, Jessica·2022·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary: The adoption of body‐worn cameras (BWCs) is often promoted in response to contentious police use of force incidents involving minority civilians. BWCs are expected to improve policing outcomes by enhancing accountability, although researchers have yet to determine whether BWCs can reduce racial/ethnic disparities. I examine whether BWCs mitigate the influence of neighborhood racial/ethnic context on arrests and use of force using cross‐classified logistic regression models to examine the outcomes of 900,000+ police–civilian contacts in Phoenix. Arrests were significantly more likely to occur in Hispanic and Black neighborhoods before and after BWC deployment, even accounting for situational, officer, and neighborhood characteristics. When BWCs were activated in Black neighborhoods, the odds of arrest decreased by 38%. However, BWCs did not moderate the influence of neighborhood percentage of Hispanic on arrest. The neighborhood racial/ethnic context was not associated with the use of force pre‐ or post‐BWC deployment. Policy Implications: Although BWCs have been associated with several positive outcomes, their ability to reduce racial/ethnic disparities appears to be overstated. As such, more targeted approaches to reducing disparities in policing outcomes are needed. For example, leveraging the information collected through BWCs could facilitate enhanced supervision to identify officers engaging in racially disparate practices and hold them accountable. Although neighborhood racial/ethnic context was a robust predictor of arrest, these results point to nuanced influences of BWC activation in minority communities. This could be due to differential causes of arrest in Black and Hispanic neighborhoods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9133.12590

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huff, J.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
Corresponding author
Huff, Jessica
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2022-05-24
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
671-711
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W4281389709
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CrimRxiv (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DigitalCommons@UNO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bureau of Justice Assistance (2015‐WY‐BX‐0004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
body-worn cameras, police use of force, racial disparities in policing, African American neighborhoods, Hispanic neighborhoods, police accountability, arrests, police oversight, Phoenix

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review