Cited by 198Policing Practices and PerceptionsGun Ownership and Violence ResearchCrime Patterns and Interventions

Race, Crime, and the Micro‐Ecology of Deadly Force

Klinger, David, Rosenfeld, Richard, Isom, Daniel, Deckard, Michael·2016·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary Limitations in data and research on the use of firearms by police officers in the United States preclude sound understanding of the determinants of deadly force in police work. The current study addresses these limitations with detailed case attributes and a microspatial analysis of police shootings in St. Louis, MO, between 2003 and 2012. The results indicate that neither the racial composition of neighborhoods nor their level of economic disadvantage directly increase the frequency of police shootings, whereas levels of violent crime do—but only to a point. Police shootings are less frequent in areas with the highest levels of criminal violence than in those with midlevels of violence. We offer a provisional interpretation of these results and call for replications in other settings . Policy Implications Nationwide replications of the current research will require the establishment of a national database of police shootings. Informative assessments of a single agency's policies and practices require comparative information from other agencies. We recommend specific data elements to be included in such an information system that would shed further empirical light on the interconnections among race, crime, and police use of deadly force. The database also would contribute to the development of evidence‐based policies and procedures on deadly force—an urgent public priority in light of recent controversial police shootings across the United States .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9133.12174

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klinger, D., Rosenfeld, R., Isom, D., & Deckard, M.
Affiliations
University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2015-11-17
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
193-222
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W2176256073
Cited by
198
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
108.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
police use of deadly force, police shootings, race, violent crime, neighborhood racial composition, microspatial analysis, St. Louis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review