Cited by 39Proteins in Food SystemsEnzyme Production and CharacterizationFood and Agricultural Sciences

Characteristics of Miniature Cheddar‐Type Cheese Made by Microbial Rennet from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens : A Comparison with Commercial Calf Rennet

An, Zhigang, He, Xiaoling, Gao, Weidong, Zhao, Wei, Zhang, Weibing·2014·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

Miniature Cheddar‐type cheeses were produced using microbial rennet from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (milk‐clotting enzyme [MCE]) or calf rennet (CAR). With the exception of pH, there were no significant differences in gross composition between MCE‐cheese (MCE‐C) and CAR‐cheese (CAR‐C). The pH value of CAR‐C was significantly higher than that of MCE‐C at 40 and 60 d of ripening. The total nitrogen content of the pH 4.6‐soluble fraction obtained from MCE‐C was higher than that obtained from CAR‐C. However, nitrogen content of the 12% TCA‐soluble fraction was similar between CAR‐C and MCE‐C. The extent of α s1 ‐casein and β‐casein hydrolysis, measured by urea‐PAGE, was similar in both cheese samples. The hydrolysis of β‐casein was lower than that of α s1 ‐casein. Different reverse phase‐high‐performance liquid chromatography peptide profiles of ethanol‐soluble and ethanol‐insoluble fractions were obtained from CAR‐C and MCE‐C. The peptide content in the 2 cheese samples increased throughout ripening; the ratio of hydrophobic to hydrophilic peptides was lower in MCE‐C than in CAR‐C. Compared with CAR‐C, MCE‐C was softer as a result of higher protein hydrolysis. Microbial rennet from B. amyloliquefaciens contributed to higher proteolytic rates, which reduced ripening time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1750-3841.12340

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
An, Z., He, X., Gao, W., Zhao, W., & Zhang, W.
Affiliations
  • Dingxi Teachers College (CN)
  • Dingxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention Dingxi 743000 China
  • Gansu Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Weibing
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-21
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
M214-21
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W1575825466
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
microbial rennet, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, calf rennet, cheese ripening, casein hydrolysis, αs1-casein, β-casein, cheese peptides, cheese texture, cheese pH, proteolysis
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacillus, Bacterial Proteins, Caseins, Cattle, Cheese, China, Food Handling, Hardness, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Milk Proteins, Peptide Fragments, Chymosin, Solubility, Time Factors, Principal Component Analysis, Mechanical Phenomena, Chemical Phenomena, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review