The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food Safety, Food Fraud, and Food Defense: A Fast Evolving Literature
Open accessAbstract
Intentional food crime is plural in nature in terms of the types of crime and the differing levels of financial gain. Successful models of food crime are dependent on how well the crime has been executed and at what point, or even if, detection actually occurs. The aim of this paper is to undertake a literature review and critique the often contradictory definitions that can be found in the literature in order to compare and contrast existing food crime risk assessment tools and their application. Food safety, food defense, and food fraud risk assessments consider different criteria in order to determine the degree of situational risk for each criteria and the measures that need to be implemented to mitigate that risk. Further research is required to support the development of global countermeasures, that are of value in reducing overall risk even when the potential hazards may be largely unknown, and specific countermeasures that can act against unique risks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to a study conducted in the USA, households and establishments providing food services are responsible for 97% of foodborne illnesses26.”
From Food handling practices and sanitary conditions of charitable food assistance programs in eThekwini District, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781439817803-12 · Cited by 9,859
Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094589 · Cited by 8,856
Gibbons, D. C., & Hirschi, T. (1970) · The Journal of Criminal Law Criminology and Police Science · doi:10.2307/1142213 · Cited by 5,215
Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud
Spink, J., & Moyer, D. C. (2011) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x · Cited by 933
Risk management — Principles and guidelines
(2009) · doi:10.5555/iso31000:2009 · Cited by 568
The Melamine Incident: Implications for International Food and Feed Safety
Gossner, C. M., Schlundt, J., Embarek, P. B., Hird, S., Wong, D. M. A. L. F., Beltran, J. J. O., Teoh, K. N., & Tritscher, A. M. (2009) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.0900949 · Cited by 414
COMMENTARY ON THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 31000–2009 “RISK MANAGEMENT. PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES”
Pletneva, N. P. (2014) · Spravochnik Inzhenernyi zhurnal · doi:10.14489/hb.supp.2014.07.pp.001-016 · Cited by 358
Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts
Carson, D., & Bull, R. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470013397 · Cited by 313
Stiborová, M., Martínek, V., Rýdlová, H., Hodek, P., & Frei, E. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 274
The Sage Dictionary of Criminology
Agnew, R. S. (2001) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 226
Public Health Response to Puffer Fish (Tetrodotoxin) Poisoning from Mislabeled Product
Cohen, N. J., Deeds, J. R., Wong, E. S., Hanner, R., Yancy, H. F., White, K. D., Thompson, T. M., Wahl, I., Pham, T. D., Guichard, F. M., et al. (2009) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x-72.4.810 · Cited by 163
Fruit Leathers: Method of Preparation and Effect of Different Conditions on Qualities
Diamante, L. M., Bai, X., & Busch, J. M. (2014) · International Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1155/2014/139890 · Cited by 100
Moll, J., & Hoque, Z. (2006) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 98
Yang, J., Hauser, R. B., & Goldman, R. H. (2013) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.010 · Cited by 89
Deliberate contamination of the food supply chain
Manning, L., Baines, R. N., & Chadd, S. A. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510589512 · Cited by 85
Self-citationFood safety management systems: Requirements for any organisation in the food chain (ISO 22000:2005)
Manavalan, R. (2015) · Journal of Developing Drugs · Cited by 75
Defining the types of counterfeiters, counterfeiting, and offender organizations
Spink, J., Moyer, D. C., Park, H., & Heinonen, J. A. (2013) · Crime Science · doi:10.1186/2193-7680-2-8 · Cited by 73
White collar crime, consumers and victimization
Croall, H. (2008) · Crime Law and Social Change · doi:10.1007/s10611-008-9147-z · Cited by 50
Understanding and managing behavioural risks: the case of malpractice in poultry production
Hirschauer, N., & Zwoll, S. (2008) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-008-9051-0 · Cited by 30
(2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203802106 · Cited by 25
Guide to protecting and defending food and drink from deliberate attack
(2014) · doi:10.3403/30295844 · Cited by 22
Mitenius, N., Kennedy, S. P., & Busta, F. F. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381504-0.00035-4 · Cited by 15
Risk and Hierarchy in International Society
Clapton, W. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137396372 · Cited by 11
Risk and Hierarchy in International Society: Liberal Interventionism in the Post-Cold War Era
Clapton, W. (2014) · Cited by 8
Food Safety Assurance Systems: Root Cause Analysis of Incidents
Motarjemi, Y., & Wallace, C. A. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-378612-8.00442-x · Cited by 8
Elliott, R. J. (2013) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2013.04.002 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- BRC, 2015, British retail consortium global standard food Safety
- Clarke RV., 1995, Situational crime prevention, crime and justice, Building a safer society: strategic approaches to crime prevention 1995, 19, 91
- Elliott Review.2014. Elliott review into the integrity and assurance of food supply networks – final report a national food crime prevention framework. HM Government July 2014. London.
- FAO, 2003, Assuring food safety and quality: Guidelines for strengthening national control systems, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper, 76, 0254
- Perline IH, 2004, The psychology and law of workplace violence: a handbook for mental health professionals and employers
- Rapalje S, 1997, A dictionary of American and English law
- Spink J, 2013, Understanding and combating food fraud, Food Technol, 671, 30
- Spink J, 2010, Combating the impact of product counterfeiting, Distribut Busine Manage J, 101, 6
- Walklate S., 2007, Understanding criminology
- WallaceCA SperberWH MortimoreSE.2011. Managing HACCP and food safety through the global supply chain.United Kingdom:Wiley Blackwell. ISBN 9781405189118.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Food Security, Safety, and Sustainability—Getting the Trade-Offs Right
Vågsholm, I., Arzoomand, N. S., & Boqvist, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00016 · Cited by 321
“Food frauds and fraudulent inputs in the food production has emerged as an issue in recent years (Manning and Soon, 2016).”
BackgroundElectronic tongue and electronic nose for food quality and safety
Lu, L., Hu, Z., Hu, X., Li, D., & Tian, S. (2022) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112214 · Cited by 307
Consumer Trust in Food and the Food System: A Critical Review
Wu, W., Zhang, A., van Klinken, R. D., Schrobback, P., & Muller, J. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10102490 · Cited by 304
New insights in food security and environmental sustainability through waste food management
Wani, N. R., Rather, R. A., Farooq, A., Padder, S. A., Baba, T. R., Sharma, S., Mubarak, N. M., Khan, A. H., Singh, P., & Ara, S. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-26462-y · Cited by 218
“Moreover, food frauds in food production that emerged a few years back could be controlled by these tags (Evans 2011; Manning and Soon 2016).”
Food fraud: policy and food chain
Manning, L. (2016) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2016.07.001 · Cited by 171
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, L., & Soon, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Royal Agricultural University (GB)
- University of Lancashire (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Manning, Louise
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03-02
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- R823-34
- ISSN
- 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-3841
- OpenAlex
- W2341811507
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Harper Adams University Repository (GuildHE Research) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
- Keywords
- food safety, food fraud, food defense, risk assessment tools, risk mitigation, countermeasures
- MeSH terms
- Crime, Food, Fraud, Humans, Risk Assessment, Food Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
