Cited by 103Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsCategorization, perception, and languageCoffee research and impacts

Using Single Free Sorting and Multivariate Exploratory Methods to Design a New Coffee Taster's Flavor Wheel

Open access
Spencer, Molly, Sage, Emma, Velez, Martin, Guinard, Jean‐Xavier·2016·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

The original Coffee Taster's Flavor Wheel was developed by the Specialty Coffee Assn. of America over 20 y ago, and needed an innovative revision. This study used a novel application of traditional sensory and statistical methods in order to reorganize the new coffee Sensory Lexicon developed by World Coffee Research and Kansas State Univ. into scientifically valid clusters and levels to prepare a new, updated flavor wheel. Seventy‐two experts participated in a modified online rapid free sorting activity (no tasting) to sort flavor attributes of the lexicon. The data from all participants were compiled and agglomeration hierarchical clustering was used to determine the clusters and levels of the flavor attributes, while multidimensional scaling was used to determine the positioning of the clusters around the Coffee Taster's Flavor Wheel. This resulted in a new flavor wheel for the coffee industry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1750-3841.13555

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sanchez Alan C. 2015 Development of a coffee lexicon and determination of differences among brewing methods [Master's thesis]. Kansas State Univ. Libraries.
  2. World Coffee Research. 2016 World coffee research sensory lexicon: unabridged definitions and references. 1st ed College Station, Tex: World Coffee Research in press. Available from: www.worldcoffeeresearch.org. Accessed 2016 June 7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, M., Sage, E., Velez, M., & Guinard, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Specialty Coffee Assoc. of America 117 W. 4th St, Suite 300 Santa Ana CA 92701 U.S.A
Corresponding author
Spencer, Molly
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-11
Volume
81
Issue
12
Pages
S2997-S3005
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W2553773726
Cited by
103
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Specialty Coffee Asscn. of America
  • World Coffee Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
hierarchical clustering, multidimensional scaling, coffee industry
MeSH terms
Coffee, Food Handling, Food Technology, Fruit, Humans, Kansas, Odorants, Taste, Reproducibility of Results, Multivariate Analysis, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review