Cited by 49Coffee research and impactsSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis

Titratable Acidity, Perceived Sourness, and Liking of Acidity in Drip Brewed Coffee

Batali, Mackenzie E., Cotter, Andrew R., Frost, Scott C., Ristenpart, William D., Guinard, Jean-Xavier·2021·ACS Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Acidity is a highly prized attribute in coffee, but there is little understanding of the brewing conditions under which acidity contributes favorable sensory attributes versus unfavorable sourness. Here, we examine the effect of titratable acidity and pH on the perception of sourness and consumer acceptance in drip brew coffee. Sour perception and acidity liking were assessed over a wide range of brew strengths and extraction yields at three different roast levels (light, medium, dark) and three different brewing temperatures (87 °C, 90 °C, and 93 °C). We find that perceived sour intensity correlates weakly with pH, but strongly with titratable acidity. Increases in titratable acidity also yielded increases in consumer perception of “too much acidity” and also impacted consumer liking and consumer preference segmentation with one cluster of consumers preferring more acidic coffee. Importantly, our data show that titratable acidity is linearly correlated with total dissolved solids (TDS) under all conditions studied, indicating that TDS is a good proxy for titratable acidity. The results presented here will provide the coffee industry with insight toward controlling perceived acidity or sourness, a key sensory attribute that substantially impacts consumer acceptance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.0c00078

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batali, M. E., Cotter, A. R., Frost, S. C., Ristenpart, W. D., & Guinard, J.-X.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Batali, Mackenzie E.
Venue
ACS Food Science & Technology
Published
2021-03-29
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
559-569
ISSN
2692-1944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3142525938
Cited by
49
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Specialty Coffee Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Keywords
coffee acidity, titratable acidity, brewing temperature, extraction yield, total dissolved solids, pH, consumer liking, sensory properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review