Cited by 15Meat and Animal Product QualityViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Study on the feasibility of using livestock blood as a fetal bovine serum substitute for cultured meat

Open access

Abstract

Fetal bovine serum (FBS) accounts for the largest portion of the cost of cultured meat production or cell culture experiments and is highly controversial in terms of animal welfare because it is taken from the fetus of a pregnant cow during slaughtering. Nevertheless, FBS is the most important supplement in the cell culture manufacturing process. This study aimed to develop an FBS substitute from slaughterhouse waste blood to reduce the cost of FBS in cultured meat production through various experiments. Our study successfully demonstrated that adult livestock blood obtained from slaughterhouses can effectively replace FBS. Our substitute, when cultured with bovine myosatellite cells, demonstrated cell growth that was either equivalent to or superior to that of commercial FBS. In the process of muscle generation through differentiation, the substitutes from bovine and chicken formed 70%–75% more bovine muscle compared to the control group using FBS. Furthermore, using the FBS substitute can reduce cell culture costs by approximately 61% compared to using commercial FBS. Therefore, the groundbreaking FBS substitute will not only contribute to the development of technology to mass‐produce cultured meat using livestock byproducts but will also lower the production cost of media for experimental cell culture or vaccine production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1750-3841.17347

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 15

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1039/C9FO02690H · DOI
  2. 10.1039/c1ib00058f · DOI
  3. 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00046 · DOI
  4. Chelladurai K. S., 2021, Alternative to FBS in animal cell culture—An overview and future perspective, Heliyon, 7, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07686 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s13197-020-04525-z · DOI
  6. 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.1.83 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18313 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s10616-019-00361-y · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113660 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s41467-023-44359-9 · DOI
  11. 10.5187/jast.2021.e40 · DOI
  12. 10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.933 · DOI
  13. 10.1071/AN18600 · DOI
  14. 10.5851/kosfa.2022.e46 · DOI
  15. 10.3390/su14116469 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113794 · DOI
  17. 10.21037/biotarget.2018.04.01 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s43016-021-00419-1 · DOI
  19. 10.12665/J18OA.Hawkes · DOI
  20. 10.1111/1541-4337.12678 · DOI
  21. 10.1152/ajpcell.00091.2011 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/bit.22545 · DOI
  23. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0094 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113194 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/s42003-022-03423-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Valk J., 2018, Fetal bovine serum (FBS): Past–present–future, ALTEX‐Alternatives to Animal Experimentation, 35, 99
  27. 10.1016/j.tiv.2003.08.009 · DOI
  28. 10.3382/ps.2010-00687 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/febs.16372 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/jn/137.6.1442 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s11626-013-9665-6 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.03.431 · DOI
  33. Yoon S. Y., 2018, Development of commercially viable method of conjugated linoleic acid synthesis using linoleic acid fraction obtained from pork by‐products, Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 38, 693
  34. 10.1080/19768354.2013.772073 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lee, D. Y., Lee, S. Y., Yun, S. H., Choi, Y., Han, D., Park, J., Kim, J. S., Mariano, E., Lee, J., Choi, J. S., Kim, G., Choi, I., Joo, S., & Hur, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
  • Gyeongsang National University (KR)
  • Department of Animal Science Chungbuk National University Cheongju Chungbuk Republic of Korea
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Yeungnam University (KR)
Corresponding author
Hur, Sun Jin
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-10-09
Volume
89
Issue
11
Pages
7143-7156
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W4403299454
Cited by
15
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chung-Ang University
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (322008-5, 321028–5)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
cultured meat, cell culture media, myogenesis, production cost reduction, animal welfare
MeSH terms
Abattoirs, In Vitro Meat, Animals, Cattle, Chickens, Culture Media, Feasibility Studies, Female, Meat, Cell Culture Techniques, Serum, Cell Proliferation, Livestock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review