The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maintenance and assessment of cell viability in formulation of non‐sporulating bacterial inoculants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The application of beneficial, plant‐associated microorganisms is a sustainable approach to improving crop performance in agriculture. However, microbial inoculants are often susceptible to prolonged periods of storage and deleterious environmental factors, which negatively impact their viability and ultimately limit efficacy in the field. This particularly concerns non‐sporulating bacteria. To overcome this challenge, the availability of protective formulations is crucial. Numerous parameters influence the viability of microbial cells, with drying procedures generally being among the most critical ones. Thus, technological advances to attenuate the desiccation stress imposed on living cells are key to successful formulation development. In this review, we discuss the core aspects important to consider when aiming at high cell viability of non‐sporulating bacteria to be applied as microbial inoculants in agriculture. We elaborate the suitability of commonly applied drying methods (freeze‐drying, vacuum‐drying, spray‐drying, fluidized bed‐drying, air‐drying) and potential measures to prevent cell damage from desiccation (externally applied protectants, stress pre‐conditioning, triggering of exopolysaccharide secretion, ‘helper’ strains). Furthermore, we point out methods for assessing bacterial viability, such as colony counting, spectrophotometry, microcalorimetry, flow cytometry and viability qPCR . Choosing appropriate technologies for maintenance of cell viability and evaluation thereof will render formulation development more efficient. This in turn will aid in utilizing the vast potential of promising, plant beneficial bacteria as sustainable alternatives to standard agrochemicals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes
Potts, M. (1994) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.58.4.755-805.1994 · Cited by 1,382
Adaptive laboratory evolution—Principles and applications for biotechnology
Dragosits, M., & Mattanovich, D. (2013) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/1475-2859-12-64 · Cited by 827
Food and health applications of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria
JB Prajapat, A. P. (2013) · Advances in Dairy Research · doi:10.4172/2329-888x.1000107 · Cited by 219
Evolutionary Adaptation to Freeze‐Thaw‐Growth Cycles in Escherichia coli
Sleight, S. C., & Lenski, R. E. (2007) · Physiological and Biochemical Zoology · doi:10.1086/518013 · Cited by 32
Cited by
A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application
Compant, S., Samad, A., Faist, H., & Sessitsch, A. (2019) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004 · Cited by 1,643
Self-citationSoil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities
O'Callaghan, M., Ballard, R. A., & Wright, D. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12811 · Cited by 489
Enabling sustainable agriculture through understanding and enhancement of microbiomes
Trivedi, P., Mattupalli, C., Eversole, K., & Leach, J. E. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17319 · Cited by 348
Elhaissoufi, W., Ghoulam, C., Barakat, A., Zeroual, Y., & Bargaz, A. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2021.08.014 · Cited by 298
Villavicencio-Vásquez, M., Espinoza-Lozano, F., Espinoza-Lozano, L., & Coronel-León, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Agronomy · doi:10.3389/fagro.2025.1578915 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Berninger, T., González López, Ó., Bejarano, A., Preininger, C., & Sessitsch, A.
- Venue
- Microbial Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-12-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-301
- ISSN
- 1751-7915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2775472968
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maintenance and assessment of cell viability in formulation of non‐sporulating bacterial inoculants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1751-7915.12880
- The paper
- Berninger, T., González López, Ó., Bejarano, A., Preininger, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2018). Maintenance and assessment of cell viability in formulation of non‐sporulating bacterial inoculants. Microbial Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12880
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.