The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Art‐omics: multi‐omics meet archaeology and art conservation
Abstract
Summary: Multi‐omics can informally be described as the combined use of high‐throughput techniques allowing the characterization of complete microbial communities by the sequencing/identification of total pools of biomolecules including DNA , proteins or metabolites. These techniques have allowed an unprecedented level of knowledge on complex microbial ecosystems, which is having key implications in land and marine ecology, industrial biotechnology or biomedicine. Multi‐omics have recently been applied to artistic or archaeological objects, with the goal of either contributing to shedding light on the original context of the pieces and/or to inform conservation approaches. In this minireview, we discuss the application of ‐omic techniques to the study of prehistoric artworks and ancient man‐made objects in three main technical blocks: metagenomics, proteomics and metabolomics. In particular, we will focus on how proteomics and metabolomics can provide paradigm‐breaking results by unambiguously identifying peptides associated with a given, palaeo‐cultural context; and we will discuss how metagenomics can be central for the identification of the microbial keyplayers on artworks surfaces, whose conservation can then be approached by a range of techniques, including using selected microorganisms as ‘probiotics’ because of their direct or indirect effect in the stabilization and preservation of valuable art objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, mass spectrometry-based proteomics has already been used in a multi-omics approach to analyze artifacts [17], archaeological clay matrices [18], and ancient food [19-21].”
From Metaproteomic analysis of King Ghezo tomb wall (Abomey, Benin) confirms 19th century voodoo sacrifices (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evershed, R. P., Heron, C., & Goad, L. J. (1990) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/an9901501339 · Cited by 316
Chemistry of Archaeological Animal Fats
Evershed, R. P., Dudd, S. N., Copley, M. S., Berstan, R., Stott, A. W., Mottram, H., Buckley, S. A., & Crossman, Z. (2002) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000200f · Cited by 303
Earliest evidence for the use of pottery
Craig, O. E., Saul, H., Lucquin, A., Nishida, Y., Taché, K., Clarke, L., Thompson, A., Altoft, D. T., Uchiyama, J., Ajimoto, M., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12109 · Cited by 302
Cappellini, E., Jensen, L. J., Szklarczyk, D., Ginolhac, A., da Fonseca, R. R., Stafford, T. W., Holen, S. R., Collins, M. J., Orlando, L., Willerslev, E., et al. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200721u · Cited by 243
Andreotti, A., Bonaduce, I., Colombini, M. P., Gautier, G., Modugno, F., & Ribechini, E. (2006) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0519615 · Cited by 198
Evidence of cacao use in the Prehispanic American Southwest
Crown, P. L., & Hurst, W. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812817106 · Cited by 170
A multi-omic future for microbiome studies
Jansson, J. K., & Baker, E. S. (2016) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.49 · Cited by 170
Ancient proteins from ceramic vessels at Çatalhöyük West reveal the hidden cuisine of early farmers
Hendy, J., Colonese, A. C., Franz, I., Fernandes, R., Fischer, R., Orton, D., Lucquin, A., Spindler, L., Anvari, J., Stroud, E., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06335-6 · Cited by 159
Altamira cave Paleolithic paintings harbor partly unknown bacterial communities
Schabereiter‐Gurtner, C., Sáiz‐Jiménez, C., Piñar, G., Lubitz, W., & Rölleke, S. (2002) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-1097(02)00668-7 · Cited by 153
Discovering Childhood: Using Fingerprints to Find Children in the Archaeological Record
Kamp, K. A., Timmerman, N., Lind, G., et al. (1999) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/2694281 · Cited by 150
Cited by
Warinner, C., Korzow Richter, K., & Collins, M. J. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00703 · Cited by 178
Charlier, P., Bourdin, V., N'Dah, D., Kielbasa, M., Pible, O., & Armengaud, J. (2024) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.202400048 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Vilanova, C., & Porcar, M.
- Affiliations
- Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL Catedrático Agustín Escardino, 9 46980 Paterna Spain
- ORCID
- Porcar, Manuel
- Venue
- Microbial Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 435-441
- ISSN
- 1751-7915
- PMC
- PMC7017809
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 52
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
