Cited by 18Occupational exposure and asthmaOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesAsthma and respiratory diseases

A comprehensive list of asthmagens to inform health interventions in the Australian workplace

Open access
Crewe, Julie, Carey, Renee, Glass, Deborah, Peters, Susan, Abramson, Michael J., Benke, Geza, Reid, Alison, Driscoll, Tim +1 more·2016·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objective To develop a comprehensive list of asthmagens which may occur in occupational settings in Australia.Methods Potential asthmagens considered for this list were identified through work health and safety classification databases in Australia and through lists developed by professional associations in other countries. Inclusion criteria were: there is evidence that the agent is asthmagenic; it is used in occupational settings; and it is available in Australia.Results The final list contained 277 asthmagens in 27 groups that may be found in occupational circumstances in Australia. Three other agents that have been documented as asthmagens in Australia were included: almond dust, fluoride (in aluminium pot room fumes); and sawdust from the Australian Blackwood.Conclusions This is the first comprehensive and inclusive list of Australian occupationally relevant asthmagens to have been compiled.Implications This list is specific for Australian workplace exposure to asthmagens. It will help focus policy and preventative practices and reduce the burden of occupational asthma. It will also be useful in future studies to identify those who are exposed to the asthmagens and provide information to assist regulators to identify industries, occupations, specific activities and existing exposure standards that can be targeted to improve worker health and welfare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1753-6405.12479

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over 250 agents may potentially cause sensitization and possibly occupational asthma.

    “Over 250 agents may potentially cause sensitization and possibly occupational asthma (OA), and comprehensive lists are available (Table 1) (112–115).”

    From Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [112]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crewe, J., Carey, R., Glass, D., Peters, S., Abramson, M. J., Benke, G., Reid, A., Driscoll, T., & Fritschi, L.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Fritschi, Lin
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
170-173
ISSN
1326-0200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116571109
Cited by
18
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Alberta
  • Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek van de Gezondheidszorg
  • Safe Work Australia
  • WorkSafe Victoria
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1056684)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
occupational asthma, occupational exposure, occupational health, allergens, fluoride, exposure standards, occupational health policy, Australia
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Occupational, Allergens, Australia, Humans, Occupational Diseases, Occupations, Occupational Health, Occupational Exposure, Workplace, Guidelines as Topic, Asthma, Occupational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review