In‐solution hybridization for mammalian mitogenome enrichment: pros, cons and challenges associated with multiplexing degraded DNA
Open accessAbstract
Here, we present a set of RNA‐based probes for whole mitochondrial genome in‐solution enrichment, targeting a diversity of mammalian mitogenomes. This probes set was designed from seven mammalian orders and tested to determine the utility for enriching degraded DNA. We generated 63 mitogenomes representing five orders and 22 genera of mammals that yielded varying coverage ranging from 0 to >5400X. Based on a threshold of 70% mitogenome recovery and at least 10× average coverage, 32 individuals or 51% of samples were considered successful. The estimated sequence divergence of samples from the probe sequences used to construct the array ranged up to nearly 20%. Sample type was more predictive of mitogenome recovery than sample age. The proportion of reads from each individual in multiplexed enrichments was highly skewed, with each pool having one sample that yielded a majority of the reads. Recovery across each mitochondrial gene varied with most samples exhibiting regions with gaps or ambiguous sites. We estimated the ability of the probes to capture mitogenomes from a diversity of mammalian taxa not included here by performing a clustering analysis of published sequences for 100 taxa representing most mammalian orders. Our study demonstrates that a general array can be cost and time effective when there is a need to screen a modest number of individuals from a variety of taxa. We also address the practical concerns for using such a tool, with regard to pooling samples, generating high quality mitogenomes and detail a pipeline to remove chimeric molecules.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reads originating from four of the 18 dental calculus libraries were impacted by chimera formation during pooled post-capture amplification and were excluded from further analysis.
“Reads originating from four of the 18 dental calculus libraries were impacted by chimera formation during pooled post‐capture amplification (Kircher et al., 2012; Hawkins et al., 2015) and were excluded from further analysis (NF‐15c KAPA HiFi Uracil+, NF‐108c Phusion HS II, and NF‐47c Phusion HS II and KAPA HiFi Uracil+).”
From Successful enrichment and recovery of whole mitochondrial genomes from ancient human dental calculus (2016) · cites this paper as Hawkins et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification
Meredith, R. W., Janečka, J. E., Gatesy, J., Ryder, O. A., Fisher, C. A., Teeling, E. C., Goodbla, A., Eizirik, E., Simão, T. L. L., Stadler, T., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1211028 · Cited by 1,464 · see citing works
Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform
Kircher, M., Sawyer, S., & Meyer, M. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr771 · Cited by 1,106 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In fact, Kircher et al. (2012) estimated that jumping PCR generated 0.4% chimeric reads in their dual indexed experiments on two Neanderthal bones when captures were multiplexed, vs. 0.03% chimeric reads when they were singleplexed.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialComplete Mitochondrial Genome and Phylogeny of Pleistocene MammothMammuthus primigenius
Rogaev, E. I., Moliaka, Y. K., Malyarchuk, B. A., Kondrashov, F. A., Derenko, M. V., Chumakov, I., & Grigorenko, A. P. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040073 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Bozarth CA, Hailer F, Rockwood LL, Edwards CW, Maldonado JE (2011a) Coyote colonization of northern Virginia and admixture with Great Lakes wolves. Journal of Mammalogy, 92, 1070-1080.
- Bozarth CA, Lance SL, Civitello DJ, Glenn JL, Maldonado JE (2011b) Phylogeography of the gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in the eastern United States. Journal of Mammalogy, 92, 283-294.
- Chevreux B, Wetter T, Suhai S (1999) Genome sequence assembly using trace signals and additional sequence information computer science and biology. Proceedings of the German Conference on Bioinformatics, 99, 45-56.
- Guti errez EE, Anderson RP, Voss RS et al. (2014) Phylogeography of Marmosa robinsoni: insights into the biogeography of dry forests in northern South America. Journal of Mammalogy, 95, 1175-1188.
- Huang Y, Niu B, Gao Y, Fu L, Li W (2010) CD-HIT Suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 26, 680-682.
- Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 25, 1754-1760.
- Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high- throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal, 17, 10.
- P€ a€ abo S, Higuchi RG, Wilson AC (1989) Ancient DNA and the poly- merase chain reaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 264, 9709-9712.
- P€ a€ abo S, Irwin D, Wilson A (1990) DNA damage promotes jumping between templates during enzymatic amplification. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 265, 4718-4721.
- P€ a€ abo S, Poinar H, Serre D et al. (2004) Genetic analyses from ancient DNA. Annual Review of Genetics, 38, 645-679.
- Pesole G, Gissi C, De Chirico A, Saccone C (1999) Nucleotide substitution rate of mammalian mitochondrial genomes. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 48, 427-434.
- Petrova TV, Zakharov ES, Samiya R, Abramson NI (2014) Phylogeogra- phy of the narrow-headed vole Lasiopodomys (Stenocranius) gregalis (Cricetidae, Rodentia) inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences: an echo of Pleistocene prosperity. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 53, 97-108.
- Schmieder R, Edwards R (2011) Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 27, 863-864.
- Shapiro B, Hofreiter M (2012) Ancient DNA: Methods and Protocols. Springer, New York.
- Siles L, Brooks DM, Aranibar H et al. (2013) A new species of Micronycteris (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from Bolivia. Journal of Mammalogy, 94, 881-896.
- Slon V, Glocke I, Barkai R et al. (2015) Mammalian mitochondrial capture, a tool for rapid screening of DNA preservation in faunal and undiag- nostic remains, and its application to Middle Pleistocene specimens from Qesem Cave (Israel). Quaternary International, 1-9, doi: 10.1016/ j.quaint.2015.03.039. · DOI
- Taberlet P, Luikart G (1999) Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 68, 41-55.
- Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2005) Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 2-Volume Set (eds Wilson D & Reeder D). The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Mary- land, USA.
- Zhang J, Kobert K, Flouri T, Stamatakis A (2014) PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 30, 614-620.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Successful enrichment and recovery of whole mitochondrial genomes from ancient human dental calculus
Ozga, A. T., Nieves‐Colón, M. A., Honap, T. P., Sankaranarayanan, K., Hofman, C. A., Milner, G. R., Lewis, C. M., Stone, A. C., & Warinner, C. (2016) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.22960 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“Readsoriginatingfromfourofthe18dentalcalculuslibra-rieswereimpactedbychimeraformationduringpooled post-captureamplification(Kircheretal.,2012;Hawkins et al., 2015) and were excluded from further analysis (NF-15c KAPA HiFi Uracil 1 , NF-108c Phusion HS II, and NF-47c Phusion HS II and KAPA HiFi…”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hawkins, M. T. R., Hofman, C. A., Callicrate, T., McDonough, M. M., Tsuchiya, M. T. N., Gutiérrez, E. E., Helgen, K. M., & Maldonado, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Smithsonian Institution (US)
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US)
- Center for Conservation and Evolutionary Genetics Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute National Zoological Park Washington DC 20008 USA
- Corresponding author
- Hawkins, Melissa T. R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Resources
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-24
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1173-1188
- ISSN
- 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0998
- OpenAlex
- W1739789680
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Ecology Resources (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Museum of Natural History
- Smithsonian Institution
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- degraded DNA, sample pooling, chimeric molecules, sequence divergence, ancient DNA
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA, Mitochondrial, Mammals, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Oligonucleotide Probes, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, DNA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review