Cited by 138Evolution and Paleontology StudiesPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyGenetic diversity and population structure

Complete Mitochondrial Genome and Phylogeny of Pleistocene MammothMammuthus primigenius

Open access
Rogaev, Evgeny I, Moliaka, Yuri K, Malyarchuk, Boris A, Kondrashov, Fyodor A, Derenko, Miroslava V, Chumakov, Ilya, Grigorenko, Anastasia P·2006·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships between the extinct woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius), and the Asian (Elephas maximus) and African savanna (Loxodonta africana) elephants remain unresolved. Here, we report the sequence of the complete mitochondrial genome (16,842 base pairs) of a woolly mammoth extracted from permafrost-preserved remains from the Pleistocene epoch--the oldest mitochondrial genome sequence determined to date. We demonstrate that well-preserved mitochondrial genome fragments, as long as approximately 1,600-1700 base pairs, can be retrieved from pre-Holocene remains of an extinct species. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the Elephantinae clade suggests that M. primigenius and E. maximus are sister species that diverged soon after their common ancestor split from the L. africana lineage. Low nucleotide diversity found between independently determined mitochondrial genomic sequences of woolly mammoths separated geographically and in time suggests that north-eastern Siberia was occupied by a relatively homogeneous population of M. primigenius throughout the late Pleistocene.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040073

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The three extant elephant species diverged approximately 6 million years ago.

    “The three extant elephant species diverged approximately 6 million years ago (Maglio, 1973; Rogaev et al., 2006)”

    From Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation (2025) · cites this paper as Rogaev et al., 2006

    The Results/Discussion uses a 6-million-year calibration for the split between the Asian elephant (E. maximus) and African savanna elephant (L. africana), while cautioning that the date depends on paleontological dating. Our copy does not extend that date to all three extant elephant species; it discusses only those two extant species. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogaev, E. I., Moliaka, Y. K., Malyarchuk, B. A., Kondrashov, F. A., Derenko, M. V., Chumakov, I., & Grigorenko, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Corresponding author
Rogaev, Evgeny I
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2006-02-07
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
e73
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2012818552
Cited by
137
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Russian Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
woolly mammoth, Mammuthus primigenius, mitochondrial genome, phylogeny, Asian elephant, Loxodonta africana, extinct species, Pleistocene, population genetic variation, Siberia
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, Mitochondrial, Elephants, Fossils, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review