Cited by 11Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

Harnessing Large Language Models for Rheumatic Disease Diagnosis: Advancing Hybrid Care and Task Shifting

Open access
Lechner, Fabian, Kuhn, Sebastian, Knitza, Johannes·2025·International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1756-185x.70124

Cites

20 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medical domain-specific tools increasingly use LLMs to retrieve verified medical information and, through retrieval-augmented generation, translate this validated content into personalized answers rather than relying solely on training data.

    “Medical domain-specific tools increasingly use LLMs to retrieve verified medical information and, through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), translate this validated content into personalized answers, rather than relying solely on training data [8].”

    From Diagnostic performance of Prof. Valmed, ChatGPT-5 Thinking, and OpenEvidence in rheumatology: A comparative evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as [8]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, et al., "Attention is all you need. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS'17. Curran Associates Inc," 2017, 6000-6010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lechner, F., Kuhn, S., & Knitza, J.
Affiliations
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Knitza, Johannes
Venue
International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
e70124-e70124
ISSN
  • 1756-1841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-185X
OpenAlex
W4407226919
Cited by
11
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Keywords
large language models, hybrid care, task shifting, clinical decision support, artificial intelligence in healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review