Cited by 1Space exploration and regulationEuropean Politics and SecurityEuropean Union Policy and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incremental Shifts, Strategic Orbits: The Evolution of EU Space Policy Through Gradual Security Linkages

Open access
Müller, Gustavo G., De Man, Philip·2026·Global Policy

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of European Union (EU) space policy through the lens of historical institutionalism, highlighting how security and defence considerations have been incrementally integrated into a domain originally framed as civilian and scientific. Rather than relying on sudden policy shifts driven by critical junctures, the EU has pursued a strategy of gradual transformation through layering and conversion—incrementally adding security dimensions to existing frameworks and repurposing institutions to support strategic objectives. The analysis reveals how external shocks, particularly Russia's invasions of Ukraine and shifting US security commitments, have acted as accelerants, reinforcing the EU's pursuit of space‐based strategic autonomy. Institutional constraints, including veto points and power dynamics among member states, have shaped the pace and scope of this evolution, necessitating a pragmatic approach to policy adaptation. The study contributes to broader debates on EU integration and institutional change, demonstrating that space policy exemplifies the Union's growing role as a geopolitical actor. The findings underscore the need for sustained coalition‐building, flexible policy adaptation, and investment in secure, autonomous space capabilities to ensure Europe's resilience in an increasingly contested global environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1758-5899.70125

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1177/13691481241227834 · DOI
  2. 10.33067/SE.4.2021.7 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/jcms.13536 · DOI
  4. Bombeek D., 2023, An Independent Europe in Space as a Product of the Post‐2022 Ukraine Invasion Geopolitical Landscape? A Critical Inquiry
  5. 10.1080/14777622.2022.2098014 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198779629.003.0002 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/jcms.13236 · DOI
  8. 10.15166/2499‐8249/669 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.178 · DOI
  10. Convention for the Establishment of a European Space Agency Paris 30 May1975.United Nations Treaty Series Vol. 1297 I‐21524 (registered 18 January 1983).
  11. Decision (CFSP).2021.2021/698 of the Council of 30 April 2021 on the Security of Systems and Services Deployed Operated and Used Under the Union Space Programme Which May Affect the Security of the Union and Repealing Decision 2014/496/CFSP OJ L 170 12.5.2021 pp. 178–182.
  12. Eggermont J., 2023, The EU'S Strategic Autonomy in the Space Domain: A Case Study on the Strategic Dependencies Within the EU Space Capacity
  13. 10.1080/07036337.2020.1869955 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/01402382.2016.1186386 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0020852313517993 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.001.0001 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1467‐9248.1996.tb00343.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/1467‐9256.12050 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.spacepol.2012.02.009 · DOI
  20. Hoerber T., 2024, The Militarization of European Space Policy
  21. Hoerber T., 2017, European Space Policy: European Integration and the Final Frontier
  22. 10.1007/978-1-137-42788-5 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/14650045.2017.1422122 · DOI
  24. Jacobs B., 2024, An Institutional Law Analysis of the European Commission's EU Space Law Proposal, Air and Space Law, 49, 161
  25. Jacobs B., 2024, Understanding the EU'S Competence to Harmonise Space Law Amid Publication Delays, Air and Space Law, 49, 473
  26. Johnson R. E., 2006, Europe's Space Policies and their Relevance to ESDP
  27. 10.30950/jcer.v16i3.1076 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101534 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.spacepol.2024.101637 · DOI
  30. Madders K., 1992, Two Europes in One Space: The Evolution of Relations Between the European Space Agency and the European Community in Space Affairs, Journal of Space Law, 20, 117, 10.56702/PJKX6569/jspalaw_2002.3 · DOI
  31. 10.1023/A:1007113830879 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1017/CBO9780511806414.003 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/978-3-030-23210-8_144 · DOI
  34. 10.46272/2587‐8476‐2021‐12‐3‐72‐86 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.015 · DOI
  36. 10.1162/002081802753485133 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/07036337.2023.2274885 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0010414096029002001 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Regulation (EC).2002.No 876/2002 of the Council of 21 May 2002 Setting Up the Galileo Joint Undertaking OJ L 138 28.5.2002 pp. 1–8.
  40. Regulation (EC).2008.No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 9 July 2008 on the Further Implementation of the European Satellite Navigation Programmes (EGNOS and Galileo)’ OJ L 196 24.7.2008 pp. 1–11.
  41. Regulation (EU).2014.No 377/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 Establishing the Copernicus Programme and Repealing Regulation (EU) No 911/2010 OJ L 122 24.7.2008 pp. 1–11.
  42. Regulation (EU) No 2023/588.2023.Establishing the Union Secure Connectivity Programme for the Period 2023–2027 OJ L 79 17.3.2023 pp. 1–39.
  43. Remuss N.‐L., 2018, Theorising Institutional Change: The Impact of the European Integration Process on the Development of Space Activities in Europe
  44. 10.1007/978-3-030-23210-8 · DOI
  45. 10.1017/9781108780865.018 · DOI
  46. Slijper F., 2015, The European Defence Agency: Arming Europe
  47. Słomczyńska I., 2020, Strategic Space Autonomy for EU Political and Security Goals. Evolution of Organisational Capacity, European Studies Quarterly, 2020
  48. 10.1017/CBO9780511491702 · DOI
  49. 10.1017/CBO9780511801938.008 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Streeck W., 2005, Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies
  51. Suzuki K., 2003, Policy Logics and Institutions of European Space Collaboration
  52. Thatcher M., 2016, The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism
  53. 10.1111/j.1467‐8543.2009.00746.x · DOI
  54. Western European Union, 2003, European Defence‐Related Space Activities and the Developments of Launcher Autonomy (WEU‐100.013 A/1822)
  55. 10.5553/EJLR/138723702016018001005 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Müller, G. G., & De Man, P.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies KU Leuven Belgium
Venue
Global Policy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-01-29
Volume
17
Issue
S3
ISSN
  • 1758-5880 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5899
OpenAlex
W7126122234
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Global Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
European Commission (620220‐EPP‐1‐2020‐1‐BE‐EPPJMO‐CoE)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Politics and Security
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
Keywords
EU space policy, space security, strategic autonomy, historical institutionalism, gradual institutional change, Russian invasion of Ukraine, US security commitments, veto points, European integration, coalition building, space capabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review