The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Nakagawa & Schielzeth extended the widely used goodness‐of‐fit statistic R2 to apply to generalized linear mixed models (GLMM s). However, their R2GLMM method is restricted to models with the simplest random effects structure, known as random intercepts models. It is not applicable to another common random effects structure, random slopes models. I show that R2GLMM can be extended to random slopes models using a simple formula that is straightforward to implement in statistical software. This extension substantially widens the potential application of R2GLMM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x · Cited by 10,356
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists.
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00141.x · Cited by 2,584
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1093/biomet/57.1.215 · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.215
- 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511810176 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01300.x · DOI · Paper page
- R Core Team, 2014, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
- 10.1177/0049124194022003004 · DOI · Paper page
- Snijders T.A.B., 2012, Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling
Cited by
(2017) · doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0213 · Cited by 2,813
A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology
Harrison, X. A., Donaldson, L., Correa-Cano, M. E., Evans, J., Fisher, D. N., Goodwin, C. E. D., Robinson, B. S., Hodgson, D. J., & Inger, R. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4794 · Cited by 2,094
rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed‐effects models
Stoffel, M. A., Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12797 · Cited by 1,766
Browning, M. H. E. M., Larson, L. R., Sharaievska, I., Rigolon, A., McAnirlin, O., Mullenbach, L., Cloutier, S., Vu, T. M., Thomsen, J., Reigner, N., et al. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245327 · Cited by 888
Complex affect dynamics add limited information to the prediction of psychological well-being.
Dejonckheere, E., Mestdagh, M., Houben, M., Rutten, I., Sels, L., Kuppens, P., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0555-0 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, P. C. D.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07-23
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 944-946
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060444352
- Cited by
- 948
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 91.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/K004484/1)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12225
- The paper
- Johnson, P. C. D. (2014). Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
