The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed‐effects models
Abstract
Summary: Intra‐class correlations (ICC) and repeatabilities (R) are fundamental statistics for quantifying the reproducibility of measurements and for understanding the structure of biological variation. Linear mixed effects models offer a versatile framework for estimating ICC and R. However, while point estimation and significance testing by likelihood ratio tests is straightforward, the quantification of uncertainty is not as easily achieved. A further complication arises when the analysis is conducted on data with non‐Gaussian distributions because the separation of the mean and the variance is less clear‐cut for non‐Gaussian than for Gaussian models. Nonetheless, there are solutions to approximate repeatability for the most widely used families of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). Here, we introduce the R package rptR for the estimation of ICC and R for Gaussian, binomial and Poisson‐distributed data. Uncertainty in estimators is quantified by parametric bootstrapping and significance testing is implemented by likelihood ratio tests and through permutation of residuals. The package allows control for fixed effects and thus the estimation of adjusted repeatabilities (that remove fixed effect variance from the estimate) and enhanced agreement repeatabilities (that add fixed effect variance to the denominator). Furthermore, repeatability can be estimated from random‐slope models. The package features convenient summary and plotting functions. Besides repeatabilities, the package also allows the quantification of coefficients of determination R2 as well as of raw variance components. We present an example analysis to demonstrate the core features and discuss some of the limitations of rptR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x · Cited by 10,356
Self-citationForming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30 · Cited by 6,903
psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research
Revelle, W. (2017) · Cited by 3,321
Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists.
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00141.x · Cited by 2,584
The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis
Bell, A. M., Hankison, S. J., & Laskowski, K. L. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.022 · Cited by 2,128
Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models
Johnson, P. C. D. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12225 · Cited by 948
Guidelines for estimating repeatability
Wolak, M. E., Fairbairn, D. J., & Paulsen, Y. R. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00125.x · Cited by 717
Cited by
Jacobson, S. L., Puitiza, A., Snyder, R. J., Sheppard, A., & Plotnik, J. M. (2022) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-021-01576-3 · Cited by 30
Rimbach, R., Yamada, Y., Sagayama, H., Ainslie, P. N., Anderson, L. F., Anderson, L. J., Arab, L., Baddou, I., Bedu-Addo, K., Blaak, E. E., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27246-z · Cited by 19
Dissegna, A., & Chiandetti, C. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.249626 · Cited by 7
Schwemmer, P., Donnez, M., Mercker, M., Garthe, S., Boschert, M., Düttmann, H., Elts, J., Fartmann, T., Fiedler, W., Jiguet, F., et al. (2026) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10371-0 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoffel, M. A., Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-05-30
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1639-1644
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2605868587
- Cited by
- 1,766
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 85.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed‐effects models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12797
- The paper
- Stoffel, M. A., Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2017). rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed‐effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.