The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing methods to separate components of beta diversity
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Two alternative frameworks have been proposed to partition compositional dissimilarity into replacement and nestedness‐resultant component or into replacement and richness‐difference components. These are, respectively, the BAS (Baselga 2010, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 134–143) and POD (Podani & Schmera . Oikos, 120, 1625–1638) frameworks. We conduct a systematic comparison of parallel components in alternative approaches. We test whether the replacement components derived from the BAS and POD frameworks are independent of richness difference. We also evaluate whether previously reported tests of monotonicity between indices and ecological processes are informative to assess the performance of indices. Finally, we illustrate the consequences of differences between the BAS and POD frameworks using the North American freshwater fish fauna as an empirical example. In the BAS framework, the nestedness‐resultant component (β jne or β sne) accounts only for richness differences derived from nested patterns while, in the POD framework, richness‐difference dissimilarity (β rich or β rich.s) accounts for all kind of richness differences. Likewise, the replacement components of both alternative methods account for different concepts. Only the replacement component of the BAS framework (β jtu or β sim) is independent of richness difference, while the parallel component in the POD framework (β−3 or β−3.s) is not (i.e. it is mathematically constrained by richness difference). Therefore, only the BAS framework allows separating (i) the variation in species composition derived from species replacement which is independent of richness difference (i.e. not mathematically constrained by it) and (ii) the variation in species composition derived from nested patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE. 1
Jaccard, P. (1912) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x · Cited by 4,561
Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity
Baselga, A. (2010) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x · Cited by 3,974
Self-citationVegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California
Whittaker, R. H. (1960) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1943563 · Cited by 3,939
betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity
Baselga, A., & Orme, C. D. L. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00224.x · Cited by 2,475
Self-citationThe ecodist Package for Dissimilarity-based Analysis of Ecological Data
Goslee, S. C., & Urban, D. L. (2007) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v022.i07 · Cited by 2,429
PARTITIONING DIVERSITY INTO INDEPENDENT ALPHA AND BETA COMPONENTS
Jost, L. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-1736.1 · Cited by 2,265
Sørensen, T. B., Sorensen, T., Biering-Sørensen, T., Ti, S., & Sorensen, J. (1948) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,066
Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data
Koleff, P., Gaston, K. J., & Lennon, J. J. (2003) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x · Cited by 1,736
Pattern and Process in Macroecology
(2000) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470999592 · Cited by 1,590
Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning
Legendre, P., & De Cáceres, M. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12141 · Cited by 1,522
Cited by
Land-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities
Gossner, M. M., Lewinsohn, T. M., Kahl, T., Grassein, F., Boch, S., Prati, D., Birkhofer, K., Renner, S. C., Sikorski, J., Wubet, T., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20575 · Cited by 706
Soininen, J., Heino, J., & Wang, J. (2018) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12660 · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- Baselga, A., & Leprieur, F.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1069-1079
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125340620
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 26.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing methods to separate components of beta diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12388
- The paper
- Baselga, A., & Leprieur, F. (2015). Comparing methods to separate components of beta diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12388
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.