Cited by 88Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyAbdominal Surgery and Complications

Association between inotrope treatment and 90‐day mortality in patients with septic shock

WILKMAN, E., KAUKONEN, K.‐M., PETTILÄ, V., KUITUNEN, A., VARPULA, M.·2013·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background Administration of inotropes in septic patients with low cardiac output or low central/mixed venous saturation is recommended in current guidelines. However, the impact of inotrope use on the outcome of these patients is controversial. We aimed to analyse the association of inotrope treatment with 90-day mortality. Methods Data from 420 consecutive patients with septic shock were retrospectively collected from the intensive care unit (ICU) data management system. Factors associated with inotrope treatment were assessed. The association of 90-day mortality with inotrope treatment was first analysed using logistic regression analysis, and second including propensity score based on observed variables for selection to inotrope treatment. A subgroup analysis was performed for the 252 patients with pulmonary artery catheter. Results One hundred eighty-six (44.3%) patients received inotrope treatment during the first 24 h in ICU. Of those, 168 (90.3%) received dobutamine, 29 (15.6%) levosimendan, and 23 (12.4%) epinephrine. Blood lactate (P Conclusion The use of inotrope treatment in septic shock was associated with increased 90-day mortality without and after adjustment with propensity to receive inotrope. To differentiate between non-observed biases of severity of septic shock and an unfavourable effect of inotropes, prospective studies are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aas.12056

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILKMAN, E., KAUKONEN, K. ‐., PETTILÄ, V., KUITUNEN, A., & VARPULA, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Department of Surgery Intensive Care Units Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Helsinki Finland
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
WILKMAN, E.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-08
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
431-442
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W1954287249
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Keywords
septic shock, inotropic support, 90-day mortality, dobutamine, levosimendan, epinephrine, norepinephrine, low cardiac output, pulmonary artery catheter, blood lactate, central venous pressure, APACHE II score, propensity score
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiotonic Agents, Catheterization, Swan-Ganz, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Shock, Septic, Stroke Volume, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review