Cited by 56Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyHeart Failure Treatment and Management

The spectrum of cardiovascular effects of dobutamine - from healthy subjects to septic shock patients

Open access
Dubin, Arnaldo, Lattanzio, Bernardo, Gatti, Luis·2017·Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva

Abstract

Dobutamine is the inotrope most commonly used in septic shock patients to increase cardiac output and correct hypoperfusion. Although some experimental and clinical studies have shown that dobutamine can improve systemic and regional hemodynamics, other research has found that its effects are heterogenous and unpredictable. In this review, we analyze the pharmacodynamic properties of dobutamine and its physiologic effects. Our goal is to show that the effects of dobutamine might differ between healthy subjects, in experimental and clinical cardiac failure, in animal models and in patients with septic shock. We discuss evidence supporting the claim that dobutamine, in septic shock, frequently behaves as a chronotropic and vasodilatory drug, without evidence of inotropic action. Since the side effects are very common, and the therapeutic benefits are unclear, we suggest that dobutamine should be used cautiously in septic shock. Before a definitive therapeutic decision, the efficacy and tolerance of dobutamine should be assessed during a brief time with close monitoring of its positive and negative side effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5935/0103-507x.20170068

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is considerable practice variation in duration of antimicrobial therapy for critically ill patients.

    “Given the lack of definitive and generalizable data regarding the optimal duration of therapy for patients who are critically ill, it is not surprising that there is considerably practice variation (281,294).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [294]

    The Introduction and 'Effects of Dobutamine in Septic Shock' sections discuss resuscitation and variable responses to dobutamine, not antimicrobial treatment. Searches for antimicrobial therapy duration, optimal antibiotic duration, and practice variation found no passage addressing the claim; the indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In sepsis, the inotropic response may be blunted with a preserved chronotropic effect causing tachycardia without increased stroke volume.

    “In addition, the inotropic response may be blunted in sepsis with a preserved chronotropic effect causing tachycardia without an increase in stroke volume (SV) [370].”
  • Dobutamine effects may not be predictable.

    “However, these effects may not be predictable [370].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dubin, A., Lattanzio, B., & Gatti, L.
Affiliations
Universidad Nacional de La Plata (AR)
Venue
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
Published
2017
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
490-498
ISSN
0103-507X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2782849077
Cited by
56
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
dobutamine, septic shock, inotropic agents, chronotropic effect, vasodilation, cardiac output, hemodynamics, heart failure, pharmacodynamics, adverse drug reactions, hypoperfusion
MeSH terms
Animals, Cardiac Output, Cardiotonic Agents, Dobutamine, Hemodynamics, Humans, Shock, Septic, Drug Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review