Cited by 60Anesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsNeonatal and fetal brain pathology

Low A pgar score, neonatal encephalopathy and epidural analgesia during labour: a S wedish registry‐based study

TÖRNELL, S., EKÉUS, C., HULTIN, M., HÅKANSSON, S., THUNBERG, J., HÖGBERG, U.·2015·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background: Maternal intrapartum fever (MF) is associated with neonatal sequelae, and women in labour who receive epidural analgesia (EA) are more likely to develop hyperthermia. The aims of this study were to investigate if EA and/or a diagnosis of MF were associated to adverse neonatal outcomes at a population level. Methods: Population‐based register study with data from the S wedish B irth R egister and the S wedish N ational P atient R egister, including all nulliparae (n = 294,329) with singleton pregnancies who gave birth at term in S weden 1999–2008. Neonatal outcomes analysed were A pgar score (AS) < 7 at 5 min and ICD‐10 diagnosis of neonatal encephalopathy (e.g. convulsions or neonatal cerebral ischaemia). Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: EA was used in 44% of the deliveries. Low AS or encephalopathy was found in 1.26% and 0.39% of the children in the EA group compared with 0.80% and 0.29% in the control group. In multivariate analysis, EA was associated with increased risk with low AS, AOR 1.27 (95% CI 1.16–1.39), but not with diagnosis of encephalopathy, 1.11 (0.96–1.29). A diagnosis of MF was associated with increased risk for both low AS, 2.27 (1.71–3.02), and of neonatal encephalopathy, 1.97 (1.19–3.26). Conclusion: Diagnosis of MF was associated with low AS and neonatal encephalopathy, whereas EA was only associated with low AS and not with neonatal encephalopathy. The found associations might be a result of confounding by indication, which is difficult to assess in a registry‐based population study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aas.12477

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TÖRNELL, S., EKÉUS, C., HULTIN, M., HÅKANSSON, S., THUNBERG, J., & HÖGBERG, U.
Affiliations
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
TÖRNELL, S.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-15
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
486-495
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W1759397537
Cited by
60
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Keywords
epidural analgesia, intrapartum fever, Apgar score, neonatal encephalopathy, neonatal outcomes, labour, confounding by indication, nulliparous women, neonatal seizures
MeSH terms
Adult, Apgar Score, Brain Diseases, Brain Ischemia, Female, Fever, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Seizures, Sweden, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Delivery, Obstetric, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review