Cited by 50Long-Term Effects of COVID-19COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Long-term consequences in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a prospective cohort study

Open access
Schandl, Anna, Hedman, Anders, Lyngå, Patrik, Fathi Tachinabad, Sozan, Svefors, Jessica, Roël, Mari, Geborek, Anne, Andersson Franko, Mikael +3 more·2021·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 can cause severe disease with need of treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) for several weeks. Increased knowledge is needed about the long-term consequences. METHODS: This is a single-center prospective follow-up study of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU for respiratory organ support between March and July 2020. Patients with invasive ventilation were compared with those with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) regarding functional outcome and health-related qualify of life. The mean follow-up time was 5 months after ICU discharge and included clinical history, three well-validated questionnaires about health-related quality of life and psychological health, pulmonary function test, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and work ability. Data were analyzed with multivariable general linear and logistic regression models with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Among 248 ICU patients, 200 patients survived. Of these, 113 patients came for follow-up. Seventy patients (62%) had received invasive ventilation. Most patients reported impaired health-related quality of life. Approximately one-third suffered from post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression. Twenty-six percent had reduced total lung capacity, 34% had reduced 6MWT and 50% worked fulltime. The outcomes were similar regardless of ventilatory support, but invasive ventilation was associated with more bodily pain (MSD -19, 95% CI: -32 to -5) and <80% total lung capacity (OR 4.1, 95% CI: 1.3-16.5). CONCLUSION: Among survivors of COVID-19 who required respiratory organ support, outcomes 5 months after discharge from ICU were largely similar among those requiring invasive compared to non-invasive ventilation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aas.13939

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schandl, A., Hedman, A., Lyngå, P., Fathi Tachinabad, S., Svefors, J., Roël, M., Geborek, A., Andersson Franko, M., Söderberg, M., Joelsson‐Alm, E., & Darlington, P.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Department of Internal Medicine Södersjukhuset Stockholm Sweden
  • Stockholm South General Hospital (SE)
  • Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Corresponding author
Darlington, Pernilla
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-25
Volume
65
Issue
9
Pages
1285-1292
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W3170126859
Cited by
50
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, long-term outcomes, intensive care unit survivors, invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula, health-related quality of life, post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression, lung function, total lung capacity, 6-minute walk test, work ability, bodily pain
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Critical Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review