Cited by 24Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Short-term prognosis and current management of syncopal patients at intermediate risk: results from the IRiS (Intermediate-Risk Syncope) study

Open access
Numeroso, Filippo, Mossini, Gianluigi, Giovanelli, Michela, Lippi, Giuseppe, Cervellin, Gianfranco·2016·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite guidelines, admission rates and expenditures for syncope remain high. This may be caused by an imprecise definition of cardiovascular disease considered at risk and an overestimation of the role of comorbidities and advanced age. In a cohort of patients with undetermined syncope, we prospectively compared the short-term prognosis of patients at intermediate risk (i.e., with stable heart diseases or comorbidities, of any age) versus those at high risk for cardiogenic syncope and identified factors associated with serious events. Secondarily, we analyzed the current management of intermediate-risk patients. METHODS: In a cohort of patients with undetermined syncope, we analyzed personal data, the presence of stable heart diseases or comorbidities, destination, length of hospitalization, incidence of serious events at 30 days, and costs. RESULTS: In a 6-month period, 347 patients (185 male and 162 female, age 72.8 years) with undetermined syncope were enrolled, 250 at intermediate risk and 97 at high risk. Intermediate-risk patients were younger, with less frequent comorbidities and with a drastically lower incidence of serious events (0.8% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001). Risk factors for cardiogenic syncope were the unique variable associated with serious events. Intermediate-risk patients were mostly admitted (62.8%) in an ordinary ward or into an emergency department observation unit; in the case of ordinary admission we observed a mean prolonged hospitalization (8.8 days), elevated costs ($270,183), and a high rate of unexplained syncope (51%). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study, the authors believe that intermediate-risk patients could be safely discharged, with potentially significant costs saving. In prognostic stratification, priority is to seek risk factors for cardiogenic syncope while advanced age, stable heart diseases, or comorbidities likely lead to inappropriate hospitalization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acem.13013

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is the acute underlying disease that most frequently determines short-term adverse events rather than the syncope itself.

    “It is the acute underlying disease that most frequently determines short-term adverse events rather than the syncope itself. 43”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Discussion says high-risk features of cardiogenic syncope were associated with short-term adverse events, and it recounts earlier work finding that underlying heart disease, rather than syncope itself, predicted death. It does not establish that acute underlying disease most frequently determines short-term adverse events; actively decompensated diseases needing admission were excluded from the study (Table 2). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Numeroso, F., Mossini, G., Giovanelli, M., Lippi, G., & Cervellin, G.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale di Parma (IT)
  • University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Numeroso, Filippo
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
941-948
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2374389791
Cited by
24
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
syncope, cardiac syncope, short-term prognosis, risk stratification, hospitalization, length of hospital stay, health care costs, unexplained syncope, risk factors, emergency department observation unit, discharge
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Emergency Medicine, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Syncope, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review