Cited by 181Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

DSM‐5 criteria for depression with mixed features: a farewell to mixed depression

Koukopoulos, A., Sani, G.·2014·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective To review the DSM-5 proposed criteria for mixed depression in light of robust and consistent historical and scientific evidence. Method An extensive historical search, a systematic review of the papers used by DSM-5 as reference papers, and a PubMed search were performed. Results As Hippocrates, depressive mixed states have been described as conditions of intense psychic suffering, consisting of depressed mood, inner tension, restlessness, and aimless psychomotor agitation. In DSM-5, new criteria are proposed for a mixed features specifier, as part of depression either in major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder. Those criteria require, as diagnostically specific, manic/hypomanic symptoms that are the least common kinds of symptoms that actually arise in depressive mixed states. The DSM-5 proposal is based, almost entirely, on a speculative wish to avoid 'overlapping' manic and depressive symptoms. Mixed states are, in fact, nothing but overlapping manic and depressive symptoms. Conclusion In this article, we review the psychopathology and research on mixed depressive states, and try to demonstrate that the DSM-5 proposal has weak scientific basis and does not identify a large number of mixed depressive states. This may be harmful because of the different treatment required by these conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12140

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DSM-5 characterization of major depression with mixed features has been criticized because it does not include several elements regarded as characteristic of mixed depression in classic and recent literature (irritability and agitation).

    “The DSM-5 characterization of major depression with mixed features has been criticized, because it does not include several elements that are regarded as characteristic of mixed depression in both the classic and the recent literature (i.e., irritability and agitation) 50 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koukopoulos, A., & Sani, G.
Affiliations
  • Centro Lucio Bini Rome Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea (IT)
Corresponding author
Koukopoulos, A.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-19
Volume
129
Issue
1
Pages
4-16
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2041765341
Cited by
181
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
mixed depression, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, manic symptoms, depressive mixed state, psychomotor agitation, diagnostic classification
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychomotor Agitation, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review