Cited by 21Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major Depression

Progression from unipolar depression to schizophrenia.

Musliner, Katherine L., Munk‐Olsen, Trine, Mors, Ole, Østergaard, Søren D.·2017·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine progression from unipolar depression (UD) to schizophrenia and to identify groups of UD patients at elevated risk for progression. METHOD: Historical prospective cohort study using data from Danish national registers. The sample included 71 932 individuals who received a diagnosis of UD in Denmark between January 1, 1995, and May 31, 2013. Analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regressions. RESULTS: The 18.5-year cumulative incidence of schizophrenia was 5.5% in women and 8.4% in men. The strongest predictors of progression included younger age (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for individuals 18-24 vs. 40+ = 7.42, 95% confidence interval = [6.29, 8.74]), psychotic symptoms at index UD diagnosis (AHR = 3.70 [3.18, 4.31]), previous disorder with psychotic features (AHR = 3.71 [3.31, 4.16]), and previous illicit substance use disorder (AHR = 1.66 [1.40, 1.97]). Groups of UD patients with different combinations of risk factors had elevated risk for progression, with 10-year cumulative incidences ranging from 9% to 62%. To conclude, at the time of UD diagnosis, the strongest risk factors for progression to schizophrenia include male sex, younger age, past/current psychotic symptoms, and illicit substance use disorders. These clinical predictors may aid in targeting monitoring for schizophrenia among patients with UD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12663

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many patients who eventually receive a diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder have previously received treatment for other and less severe mental disorders.

    “In fact, many patients who eventually receive a diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder have previously received treatment for other and less severe mental disorders.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Musliner, K. L., Munk‐Olsen, T., Mors, O., & Østergaard, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Musliner, Katherine L.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-04
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
42-50
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2546610740
Cited by
21
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lundbeckfonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, risk factors, psychotic symptoms, age, sex differences, cumulative incidence, depression monitoring
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Denmark, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Registries, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Disease Progression, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review