Cited by 41Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

From depression to anxiety, and back

Open access
Bui, Eric, Fava, Maurizio·2017·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

While many clinicians have believed for decades that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may increase anxiety soon after antidepressant treatment initiation, this effect has never been clearly documented. In the present issue, Näslund et al. 1 reported that in the first week after treatment initiation in trials involving patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), compared to pill placebo, SSRIs were associated with lower incidence rates of psychological signs of anxiety and agitation, and higher levels of somatic symptoms of anxiety, as assessed by the specific items derived from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Empirical data suggest that depression and anxiety disorders are highly comorbid with, for example, 68% of individuals with MDD also meeting criteria for a comorbid lifetime anxiety disorder 2. Similarly, 45%–46% of 3787 out-patients with MDD in the STAR*D study were deemed to meet criteria for anxious depression 3. Näslund et al.'s study 1 illustrates the close relationship between anxiety and depression, and the need for an approach that can integrate this close-knit relationship into the way that anxiety and depression are conceptualized, assessed, studied, and treated. Successfully developing and using such an approach is likely to critically accelerate our understanding of affective disorders and our capacity to care for individuals who suffer from them. The interdependent relationship of depression and anxiety has long been suggested and described, with early conceptualizations of depression giving a central role to anxiety. For example, in the DSM-I 4, depressive reaction, a precursor of MDD, was described as a form of attenuated anxiety: 'The anxiety in this [depressive] reaction is allayed, and hence partially relieved, by depression and self-depreciation.' While the DSM-5 5 does not include anxiety as a core symptom of depression, it uses the specifier 'with anxious distress' to reflect the presence of at least two of five anxiety symptoms associated with MDD such as feeling keyed up or tense, being unusually restless, having trouble concentrating because of worry, having fear that something awful may happen, and feeling that one might lose control of oneself. Furthermore, conditions such as panic disorder and generalized disorder are very commonly reported among both unipolar depression and bipolar disorder patients 6. Over 60 years later, this relationship is illustrated in a number of ways, including by the continuous use of well-established measures of depression that include anxiety symptoms. Thus, it is interesting to note that in Näslund et al.'s study 1, anxiety was assessed using three items of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Vice versa, the gold standard for assessing anxiety symptom severity—the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale—includes items assessing symptoms overlapping with MDD (concentration, sleep) as well as depressed mood. Finally, empirical data suggest common neurobiological pathways to depressive and anxiety disorders, including dysfunction in the serotonergic system 7 that may explain the efficacy of SSRIs in both these types of disorders. This close relationship between depression and anxiety suggests that an approach allowing the study—and treatment—of the mood/anxiety spectrum within a common framework may significantly move our field forward. The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative of the National Institute of Mental Health is a recently proposed transdiagnostic approach that aims to examine dysfunctions in brain circuits underlying clinical features that cut across disorders 8. In this dimensional framework, mental disorders are not seen as unitary disease entities, but as spectra of dysfunctions of brain circuits. This approach aims to identify 'bio-signatures' for certain dysfunctions that would serve to guide targeted therapeutic interventions. For example, negative valence has been proposed as a system spanning across depressive and anxiety disorders and may be a good target for intervention if empirical data support its role in these conditions. The RDoC's vision is that future classification of mental disorders will rely on the identification of these dysfunctions in neurocircuit systems, and that future healthcare providers will use neuroimaging, genomic sequencing, and laboratory tests' data to determine prognosis and appropriate treatment. Recently, another novel transdiagnostic approach to mental disorders has been proposed based on the use of network analyses 9. While the conventional framework to mental disorders posits that specific symptoms are used as indicators of a presumed underlying disease or disorder, the network framework conceptualizes mental disorders as webs of connected symptoms that mutually reinforce each other. The fact that depressive and anxiety symptoms coexist in the same individual is not explained by the co-occurrence of two distinct clinical entities, but rather, by the fact that these symptoms r

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12801

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The corticolimbic-striatal networks involved in functions like emotion regulation, decision-making, and salience processing have generally been associated with decreased functional connectivity in MDD relative to controls.

    “These corticolimbicstriatal networks involved in functions like emotion regulation, decision-making, and salience processing, and have generally been associated with decreased functional connectivity in MDD relative to controls [82].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disor- ders DSM5 fifth edition. Washington D.C.: American Psy- chiatric Publishing, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bui, E., & Fava, M.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-02
Volume
136
Issue
4
Pages
341-342
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2752913033
Cited by
41
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
comorbid depression and anxiety, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, major depressive disorder, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, STAR*D, somatic anxiety, agitation, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, treatment-resistant depression
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review