Cited by 16Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesGambling Behavior and Treatments

Frustrated expected reward induces differential transcriptional changes in the mouse brain: Microarrays and frustration

Open access
Martín-García, Elena, Fernández-Castillo, Noelia, Burokas, Aurelijus, Gutiérrez-Cuesta, Javier, Sánchez-Mora, Cristina, Casas, Miguel, Ribasés, Marta, Cormand, Bru +1 more·2015·Addiction Biology

Abstract

Frustration represents a particular aspect of the addictive process that is related to loss of control when the expected reward is not obtained. We aim to study the consequences of frustrated expected reward on gene expression in the mouse brain. For this purpose, we used an operant model of frustration using palatable food as reward combined with microarrays. Transcriptomic profiles of frontal cortex, ventral striatum and hippocampus were analysed in five groups of mice: (1) positive control receiving palatable food and the cue light as conditioned stimulus; (2) frustrated group only receiving the cue light; (3) extinction learning group that did not receive palatable food nor the light; (4) negative control that never received the reinforcer nor the light during the whole experiment; and (5) yoked that received palatable food passively. Gene expression changes produced by frustration were revealed in the frontal cortex and ventral striatum, but not in the hippocampus. Most of the changes, such as the modification of the dopamine-DARPP-32 signalling pathway, were common in both areas and estimated to have neuronal origin. Extinction learning induced transcriptional changes only in the ventral striatum, with most genes showing down-regulation and without alteration in the dopamine-DARPP-32 signalling pathway. Active palatable food-seeking behaviour induced changes in gene expression in ventral striatum mainly affecting cell communication. In conclusion, frustration behaviour-induced changes in frontal cortex and ventral striatum mainly related to dopamine-DARPP-32 signalling that could play an important role in the loss of behavioural control during the addictive processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/adb.12188

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The downregulation of dopamine-DARPP32 feedback in cAMP signaling was also found altered in the ventral striatum and the frontal cortex of an operant mouse model of frustration showing aggressive behavior.

    “The only consistent directional change of these shared pathways between the two rodent models, the downregulation of the dopamine-DARPP32 feedback in cAMP signaling, was also found altered in the ventral striatum and the frontal cortex of an operant mouse model of frustration showing aggressive behavior [63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martín-García, E., Fernández-Castillo, N., Burokas, A., Gutiérrez-Cuesta, J., Sánchez-Mora, C., Casas, M., Ribasés, M., Cormand, B., & Maldonado, R.
Affiliations
  • Laboratori de Neurofarmacologia; Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut; PRBB; Universitat Pompeu Fabra; Spain
  • Departament de Genètica; Facultat de Biologia; Universitat de Barcelona; Spain
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Department of Psychiatry; Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron; Spain
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
Corresponding author
Maldonado, Rafael
Venue
Addiction Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-06
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
22-37
ISSN
1355-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163818839
Cited by
16
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (2009-SGR-00131 and 2014-SGR-0932)
  • European Commission (FP7/2007– 2013 grant agreement n° 602805)
  • ICREA Fundation (ICREA Academia 2008)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RTA, RD06/001/001, RTA, PI11/01629)
  • Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social (PNSD 2009/022 and 2099/026)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
frustration, expected reward, gene expression, brain transcriptome, frontal cortex, ventral striatum, hippocampus, extinction learning, operant conditioning, loss of control, addiction, intercellular communication
MeSH terms
Homeobox Protein Nkx-2.5, Animals, Brain, Conditioning, Operant, Food, Frontal Lobe, Frustration, Hippocampus, Male, Reward, RNA, Messenger, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Trans-Activators, Gene Expression, Homeodomain Proteins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Sex-Determining Region Y Protein, Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32, SOXD Transcription Factors, Transcriptome, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review