The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: a cross-sectional population study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are rapidly increasing in popularity. Two randomized controlled trials have suggested that e-cigarettes can aid smoking cessation, but there are many factors that could influence their real-world effectiveness. This study aimed to assess, using an established methodology, the effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation compared with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) bought over-the-counter and with unaided quitting in the general population. DESIGN AND SETTING: A large cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of the English population. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 5863 adults who had smoked within the previous 12 months and made at least one quit attempt during that period with either an e-cigarette only (n = 464), NRT bought over-the-counter only (n = 1922) or no aid in their most recent quit attempt (n = 3477). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was self-reported abstinence up to the time of the survey, adjusted for key potential confounders including nicotine dependence. FINDINGS: E-cigarette users were more likely to report abstinence than either those who used NRT bought over-the-counter [odds ratio (OR) = 2.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.70-2.93, 20.0 versus 10.1%] or no aid (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.08-1.76, 20.0 versus 15.4%). The adjusted odds of non-smoking in users of e-cigarettes were 1.63 (95% CI = 1.17-2.27) times higher compared with users of NRT bought over-the-counter and 1.61 (95% CI = 1.19-2.18) times higher compared with those using no aid. CONCLUSIONS: Among smokers who have attempted to stop without professional support, those who use e-cigarettes are more likely to report continued abstinence than those who used a licensed NRT product bought over-the-counter or no aid to cessation. This difference persists after adjusting for a range of smoker characteristics such as nicotine dependence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation
Cahill, K., Stead, L., & Lancaster, T. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006103.pub2 · Cited by 747
Vangeli, E., Stapleton, J., Smit, E. S., Borland, R., & West, R. (2011) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03565.x · Cited by 607 · cited 1×
“However, previous population studies have found that the strength of this motivation is not associated with success of quit attempts once started, so it is unlikely to explain our findings [45].”
Self-citationKotz, D., Brown, J., & West, R. (2014) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12429 · Cited by 283
Self-citationBrown, J., West, R., Beard, E., Michie, S., Shahab, L., & McNeill, A. (2014) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.03.009 · Cited by 242
Self-citationImpact of over-the-counter sales on effectiveness of pharmaceutical aids for smoking cessation
Pierce, J. P. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.10.1260 · Cited by 240
What makes for an effective stop-smoking service?
Brose, L. S., West, R., McDermott, M. S., Fidler, J. A., Croghan, E., & McEwen, A. (2011) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200251 · Cited by 110
Self-citationShould electronic cigarettes be as freely available as tobacco cigarettes? No
Chapman, S. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f3840 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Kalkhoran, S., & Glantz, S. A. (2016) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00521-4 · Cited by 895
Hajek, P., Etter, J., Benowitz, N., Eissenberg, T., & McRobbie, H. (2014) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12659 · Cited by 546
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
Hartmann-Boyce, J., Lindson, N., Butler, A. R., McRobbie, H., Bullen, C., Begh, R., Theodoulou, A., Notley, C., Rigotti, N. A., Turner, T., et al. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010216.pub7 · Cited by 320
Current advances in research in treatment and recovery: Nicotine addiction
Prochaska, J. J., & Benowitz, N. L. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay9763 · Cited by 219
Ballbè, M., Martínez-Sánchez, J. M., Sureda, X., Fu, M., Pérez-Ortuño, R., Pascual, J. A., Saltó, E., & Fernández, E. (2014) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.09.005 · Cited by 188
Smoking cessation, version 1.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology
Shields, P. G., Herbst, R. S., Arenberg, D., Benowitz, N. L., Bierut, L., Luckart, J. B., Cinciripini, P., Collins, B., David, S., Davis, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2016.0152 · Cited by 146
A naturalistic, randomized pilot trial of e-cigarettes: uptake, exposure, and behavioral effects.
Carpenter, M. J., Heckman, B. W., Wahlquist, A. E., Wagener, T. L., Goniewicz, M. L., Gray, K. M., Froeliger, B., & Cummings, K. M. (2017) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0460 · Cited by 93
Electronic cigarette use and exposure in the pediatric population
Collaco, J. M., Drummond, M. B., & McGrath-Morrow, S. A. (2015) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2898 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J., Beard, E., Kotz, D., Michie, S., & West, R.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-08
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1531-1540
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146784275
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 45.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
