Cited by 780Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours?

Open access

Abstract

Following the recent changes to the diagnostic category for addictive disorders in DSM‐5, it is urgent to clarify what constitutes behavioural addiction to have a clear direction for future research and classification. However, in the years following the release of DSM‐5, an expanding body of research has increasingly classified engagement in a wide range of common behaviours and leisure activities as possible behavioural addiction. If this expansion does not end, both the relevance and the credibility of the field of addictive disorders might be questioned, which may prompt a dismissive appraisal of the new DSM‐5 subcategory for behavioural addiction. We propose an operational definition of behavioural addiction together with a number of exclusion criteria, to avoid pathologizing common behaviours and provide a common ground for further research. The definition and its exclusion criteria are clarified and justified by illustrating how these address a number of theoretical and methodological shortcomings that result from existing conceptualizations. We invite other researchers to extend our definition under an Open Science Foundation framework.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.13763

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. West R., 2006, Theory of Addiction
  2. West R., 2013, EMCDDA Insights: Models of Addiction. EMCDDA Insights Series no. 14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 780

Metadata

Authors
Kardefelt‐Winther, D., Heeren, A., Schimmenti, A., van Rooij, A., Maurage, P., Carras, M., Edman, J., Blaszczynski, A., Khazaal, Y., & Billieux, J.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT)
  • Department of Communication Sciences imec–mict–Ghent University Ghent Belgium
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Gambling Treatment Clinic and Research, School of Psychology University of Sydney Sydney Australia
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Kardefelt‐Winther, Daniel
  • Billieux, Joël
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-15
Volume
112
Issue
10
Pages
1709-1715
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2588289500
Cited by
780
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 35
FWCI
11.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (5T32MH014592‐39)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
behavioral addiction, DSM-5, addiction, operational definitions, exclusion criteria, diagnostic classification, conceptualization of addiction, leisure
MeSH terms
Humans, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review