Cited by 956Behavioral Health and InterventionsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Imaginary Relish and Exquisite Torture: The Elaborated Intrusion Theory of Desire.

Open access
Kavanagh, David J., Andrade, Jackie, May, Jon·2005·Psychological Review

Abstract

The authors argue that human desire involves conscious cognition that has strong affective connotation and is potentially involved in the determination of appetitive behavior rather than being epiphenomenal to it. Intrusive thoughts about appetitive targets are triggered automatically by external or physiological cues and by cognitive associates. When intrusions elicit significant pleasure or relief, cognitive elaboration usually ensues. Elaboration competes with concurrent cognitive tasks through retrieval of target-related information and its retention in working memory. Sensory images are especially important products of intrusion and elaboration because they simulate the sensory and emotional qualities of target acquisition. Desire images are momentarily rewarding but amplify awareness of somatic and emotional deficits. Effects of desires on behavior are moderated by competing incentives, target availability, and skills. The theory provides a coherent account of existing data and suggests new directions for research and treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.112.2.446

Cites

292 of 292 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies show that restrictive eaters experience more food cravings.

    “However, several studies show that restrictive eaters experience more food cravings (FC).”

    From Craving for carbs: food craving and disordered eating in low-carb dieters and its association with intermittent fasting (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The ‘Interference with imagery’ section (page unavailable) describes studies measuring food cravings in dieters and nondieters. It reports that food-related images increased craving ratings, but does not say restrictive eaters had more cravings than nonrestrictive eaters or that several studies found that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Intrusive thoughts on the addictive activity can be tormenting if there is little chance of realizing them in action.

    “They argue that intrusive thoughts on the addictive activity can be tormenting if there is little chance of realizing them in action.”

    From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Kavanagh et al., 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [7]7. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  2. [59]59. Green, M., Rogers, P., & Elliman, N. (2000). Dietary restraint and addictive behaviours: The generalizability of Tiffany's cue reactivity model. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 27, 419-427.
  3. [102]102. Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (1985). Relapse prevention. New York: Guilford Press.
  4. [126]126. Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorisation of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1-15.
  5. [143]143. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2003). Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 25-53.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavanagh, D. J., Andrade, J., & May, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2005-04
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
446-467
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2141738416
Cited by
956
References
277
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 35
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
desire, appetitive behavior, intrusive thoughts, cognitive elaboration, working memory, sensory imagery, affective cognition, conscious cognition, emotional deficits
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Imagination, Psychological Theory, Volition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review