Cited by 1,205Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research

Open access
Billieux, Joël, Maurage, Pierre, Lopez-Fernandez, Olatz, Kuss, Daria J., Griffiths, Mark D.·2015·Current Addiction Reports

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to the pathway model, an addictive pattern of mobile phone use is characterized by the use of specific applications, including calls, instant messaging, and the use of social networks.

    “According to the pathway model, an addictive pattern of mobile phone use is characterized by the use of specific applications, including calls, instant messaging, and the use of social networks.”

    From Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned (2017) · cites this paper as [82]

  • Problematic mobile phone use is a multi-faceted condition, with dependent use being one of four possible pathways, in addition to dangerous, prohibited, and financially problematic use.

    “Recent research has suggested problematic mobile phone use is a multi-faceted condition, with dependent use being one of four possible pathways, in addition to dangerous, prohibited, and financially problematic use [82].”

    From Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned (2017) · cites this paper as [82]

  • Research literature often approaches media use as a potential threat or harmful activity, using language around social media 'addiction' and 'problematic use', which can pathologise social media use despite insufficient evidence for considering it an addiction.

    “For example, research literature often approaches media use as a potential threat or harmful activity, using language around social media "addiction" and "problematic use" [10,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79], which can pathologise social media use despite insufficient evidence for considering it an addiction [80].”
  • The smartphone has raised concerns about its potential to be addictive, as happens with other possible behavioral addictions such as those to the Internet or to social networking sites.

    “Because of its popularity and because it is a relatively new device (compared to the “classical” mobile phone), the smartphone has raised concerns about its potential to be addictive [9,10,11,12] as happens with other possible behavioral addictions, such as those to the Internet or to social networking sites [13].”
  • The range of values for problematic users or addicts ranges between 0% and 35%, with 10-20% being the most frequent values, although there have been reports of 48% in university students.

    “A preliminary comparison shows that the range of values for problematic users or addicts ranges between 0% and 35%, with 10–20% being the most frequent values [7,10,12], although there have been reports of 48% in university students [24].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Billieux, J., Maurage, P., Lopez-Fernandez, O., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Billieux, Joël
Venue
Current Addiction Reports
Published
2015-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
156-162
ISSN
2196-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024642011
Cited by
1,205
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 153 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 14
FWCI
168.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Addiction Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
problematic mobile phone use, behavioral addiction, mobile phone addiction, neurobiology of addiction, relationship problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review