Changes in undergraduates’ marijuana, heavy alcohol and cigarette use following legalization of recreational marijuana use in Oregon
Abstract
Background and Aims: Recreational marijuana legalization (RML) went into effect in Oregon in July 2015. RML is expected to influence marijuana use by adolescents and young adults in particular, and by those with a propensity for substance use. We sought to quantify changes in rates of marijuana use among college students in Oregon from pre‐ to post‐RML relative to college students in other states across the same time period. Design: Repeated cross‐sectional survey data from the 2012–16 administrations of the Healthy Minds Study. Setting: Seven 4‐year universities in the United States. Participants: There were 10 924 undergraduate participants. One large public Oregon university participated in 2014 and 2016 ( n = 588 and 1115, respectively); six universities in US states where recreational marijuana use was illegal participated both in 2016 and at least once between 2012 and 2015. Measurements: Self‐reported marijuana use in the past 30 days (yes/no) was regressed on time (pre/post 2015), exposure to RML (i.e. Oregon students in 2016) and covariates using mixed‐effects logistic regression. Moderation of RML effects by recent heavy alcohol use was examined. Findings: Rates of marijuana use increased from pre‐ to post‐2015 at six of the seven universities, a trend that was significant overall. Increases in rates of marijuana use were significantly greater in Oregon than in comparison institutions, but only among students reporting recent heavy alcohol use. Conclusions: Rates of Oregon college students’ marijuana use increased (relative to that of students in other states) following recreational marijuana legislation in 2015, but only for those who reported recent heavy use of alcohol. Such alcohol misuse may be a proxy for vulnerabilities to substance use or lack of prohibitions (e.g. cultural) against it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Overall, studies examining cannabis use behavior revealed evidence for cannabis use increases following RCL, particularly for young adults (100%), peri-natal users (66%), and certain clinical populations (66%).
“Overall, studies examining cannabis use behavior revealed evidence for cannabis use increases following RCL, particularly for young adults (100%), peri-natal users (66%), and certain clinical populations (66%).47,54,59”
From The Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Cannabis Use and Associated Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765 · see citing works
Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review
Chesney, E., Goodwin, G. M., & Fazel, S. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20128 · Cited by 2,115 · see citing works
Help-Seeking and Access to Mental Health Care in a University Student Population
Eisenberg, D., Golberstein, E., & Gollust, S. E. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31803bb4c1 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smart, R., & Pacula, R. L. (2019) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2019.1669626 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Farrelly, K. N., Wardell, J. D., Marsden, E., Scarfe, M. L., Najdzionek, P., Turna, J., & MacKillop, J. (2023) · Substance Abuse Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/11782218231172054 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Roche, D. J. O., Bujarski, S., Green, R., Hartwell, E. E., Leventhal, A. M., & Ray, L. A. (2019) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.02.035 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Exploring Cannabis and Alcohol Co-Use in Adolescents: A Narrative Review of the Evidence
Karoly, H. C., Ross, J. M., Ellingson, J. M., & Feldstein Ewing, S. W. (2020) · Journal of Dual Diagnosis · doi:10.1080/15504263.2019.1660020 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kerr, D. C. R., Bae, H., Phibbs, S., & Kern, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kerr, David C. R.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-11
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1992-2001
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2735431526
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- recreational cannabis legalization, cannabis use, university students, heavy alcohol use, cigarette smoking, Oregon, substance use policy, young adults, Healthy Minds Study
- MeSH terms
- Alcohol Drinking in College, Cigarette Smoking, Marijuana Use, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Legislation, Drug, Male, Oregon, Students, Universities, Logistic Models, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review