Cited by 8Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

The need to exercise caution in accepting addiction as a reason for performing euthanasia

Hall, Wayne, Parker, Malcolm·2018·Addiction

Abstract

The recent practice in Belgium and the Netherlands of accepting addiction as a reason for performing euthanasia raises important issues for the field of addiction and the practice of euthanasia. In this paper we outline some of these issues. We also argue that physicians making decisions about whether to accept requests for euthanasia from people with an allegedly untreatable addiction should consider two issues carefully. They should ensure that: (1) the person has the capacity to give free and informed consent to undergo euthanasia; and (2) their request is the outcome of a deliberative process in which all reasonable treatment options and harm reduction measures have been offered to and considered by the person.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.14025

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, W., & Parker, M.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Hall, Wayne
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-10
Volume
113
Issue
7
Pages
1178-1180
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2763435546
Cited by
8
References
10
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
euthanasia, physician-assisted death, informed consent, decision-making capacity, harm reduction, treatment options, end-of-life decisions, Belgium, Netherlands
MeSH terms
Humans, Informed Consent, Netherlands, Mental Competency, Suicide, Assisted, Substance-Related Disorders, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review