Cited by 185Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance

Illicit fentanyls in the opioid street market: desired or imposed?

Open access
Mars, Sarah G., Rosenblum, Daniel, Ciccarone, Daniel·2019·Addiction

Abstract

Background: Illicitly manufactured fentanyl and its analogues are appearing in countries throughout the world, often disguised as heroin or counterfeit prescription pills, with resulting high overdose mortality. Possible explanations for this phenomenon include reduced costs and risks to heroin suppliers, heroin shortages, user preferences for a strong, fast‐acting opioid and the emergence of Dark Web cryptomarkets. This paper addresses these potential causes and asks three questions: (1) can users identify fentanyl; (2) do users desire fentanyl; and (3) if users want fentanyl, can they express this demand in a way that influences the supply? Argument/analysis: Existing evidence, while limited, suggests that some users can identify fentanyl, although not reliably, and some desire it, but because fentanyl is frequently marketed deceptively as other drugs, users lack information and choice to express demand effectively. Even when aware of fentanyl's presence, drug users may lack fentanyl‐free alternatives. Cryptomarkets, while difficult to quantify, appear to offer buyers greater information and competition than offline markets. However, access barriers and patterns of fentanyl‐related health consequences make cryptomarkets unlikely sources of user influence on the fentanyl supply. Market condition data indicate heroin supply shocks and shortages prior to the introduction of fentanyl in the United States and parts of Europe, but the much lower production cost of fentanyl compared with heroin may be a more significant factor Conclusion: Current evidence points to a supply‐led addition of fentanyl to the drug market in response to heroin supply shocks and shortages, changing prescription opioid availability and/or reduced costs and risks to suppliers. Current drug users in affected regions of the United States, Canada and Europe appear largely to lack both concrete knowledge of fentanyl's presence in the drugs they buy and access to fentanyl‐free alternatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.14474

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fentanyl did not saturate each state's unregulated drug market at the same time; from about 2013 onward, it spread from east to west over the course of several years.

    “However, fentanyl did not saturate each state’s unregulated drug market at the same time25; from about 2013 onward, it spread from east to west over the course of several years.20,26”

    From Drug Decriminalization, Fentanyl, and Fatal Overdoses in Oregon (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The contamination of fentanyl in illicit drugs is driven by supply rather than demand.

    “which is consistent with findings that the contamination of fentanyl in illicit drugs is supply, rather than demand, driven”

    From “I probably got a minute”: Perceptions of fentanyl test strip use among people who use stimulants (2021) · cites this paper as Mars, Rosenblum, & Ciccarone, 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Canadian Community Epidemiology Network on Drug Use (CCENDU) Deaths Involving Fentanyl in Canada, 2009–2014. CCENDU Bulletin 2015. Ottowa, ON: CCNDU; 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mars, S. G., Rosenblum, D., & Ciccarone, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Mars, Sarah G.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-04
Volume
114
Issue
5
Pages
774-780
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2902629504
Cited by
185
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA037820)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Keywords
illicit fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, heroin shortage, drug supply, drug overdose deaths
MeSH terms
Costs and Cost Analysis, Heroin, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fentanyl, Humans, Illicit Drugs, United States, Drug Costs, Counterfeit Drugs, Drug Overdose, Drug Trafficking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review