Cited by 16Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The rs75932628 and rs2234253 polymorphisms of the TREM2 gene were associated with susceptibility to frontotemporal lobar degeneration in Caucasian populations

Su, Wen‐Hua, Shi, Zhi‐Hong, Liu, Shu‐Ling, Wang, Xiao‐Dan, Liu, Shuai, Ji, Yong·2018·Annals of Human Genetics

Abstract

Polymorphisms of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) gene have been reported to be potentially associated with the risks of developing frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), with inconsistent conclusions. This study aims to comprehensively investigate the potential role of TREM2 variants in FTLD risks via a meta‐analysis. We included a total of eight eligible articles. For TREM2 rs75932628, we observed a significantly increased FTLD risk in the models of T vs. C [Association Test, odds ratio (OR) = 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.43∼4.14, P = 0.001], CT vs. CC (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.39∼3.71, P = 0.001), CT + TT vs. CC (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.38∼3.71, P = 0.001), and Carrier T vs. C (OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.38∼3.69, P = 0.001). Similarly, we observed positive results for TREM2 rs2234253 in all of the genetic models (all OR > 1, P = 0.030). Nevertheless, we did not observe any statistical difference between the case and control groups in the pooled analyses of TREM2 rs142232675 and rs143332484 (all P > 0.05). Our findings identified the rs75932628 and rs2234253 polymorphisms of the TREM2 gene as risk factors for FTLD in Caucasian populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ahg.12241

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, W., Shi, Z., Liu, S., Wang, X., Liu, S., & Ji, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin Huanhu Hospital (CN)
  • Department of Neurology Tianjin Huanhu Hospital Tianjin China
Corresponding author
Ji, Yong
Venue
Annals of Human Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-10
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
177-185
ISSN
  • 0003-4800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1809
OpenAlex
W2783278502
Cited by
16
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81300947, 81571057)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
TREM2, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, genetic polymorphism, genetic susceptibility, Alzheimer's disease, Caucasian population
MeSH terms
Humans, Membrane Glycoproteins, Receptors, Immunologic, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review